@Tim G.
Can you give some examples of what markets are crushing in direct mail vs online and vice versa. This statement without any type of data behind it leaves me without any information to believe it. I agree that markets out side of major metropolitan markets can be successfully targeted with direct mail, but there needs to be a real discussion on how ineffective it is in large markets. I have the data to back this up in San Diego.
I am in NW Indiana market and Direct Mail performs better in my market compared to Online. I have closed deals from both sources but Direct Mail gets me more leads and deals compared to Online Marketing. I am part of couple of Masterminds and there are investors who swear by Direct Mail and there are investors who swear by Online Marketing. Again, it depends from market to market. I do agree with you that direct mail isn't as effective in large markets as it is in marketing surrounding the major cities. I guess I am 30-45 mins outside of Chicago so I fall in one of the markets where Direct Mail still works well.
The statement that people who send out volume in direct mail must be only doing it because is also something I would not agree with. I can point out countless new investors who come to this forum for guidance, create a direct mail campaign that bombs and they fizzle out with nothing to show for their efforts. Those that got rich during the gold rush are the ones who sold the shovels and buckets. I believe that to be the case when it comes to marketing in the real estate world, especially within the bigger pockets community where vendors participate in the discussions.
It's not about volume. It is about consistency in your marketing and it doesn't apply to Direct Mail but it applies to any marketing channel. I can spend $100,000 in PPC or Direct Mail but if I spend all of that money in 1 month and I don't have a good follow up system, then what good will that $100,000 do to me? I would be lucky to close a deal with that kind of strategy. Generally speaking, the best marketing strategy for any investor is the one they can stick with the longest.
A lot of investors fail with their marketing strategy because they don't stick with it long enough to work whether it is Direct Mail, PPC, SMS Blast, RVM, etc.
If your company is marketing for and soliciting business for direct mail services via this forum that creates the opportunity for a bias.
Many of the participants in this discussion have no dog in this fight. We don't offer marketing services and benefit from information being posted in support of direct mail. It would appear that you would. While I don't mean to sound disrespectful, I am very suspicious of the business services that frequent this forum and provide information in favor of their product/service. I am unsure if it is truly in the best of intentions.
That's totally a fair point but I will point that my intention is not to solicit business for Direct Mail but to answer a question from experience. There are several other great companies out there that investors can use for Direct Mail like Yellow Letters, Open Letter Marketing etc. and I am more than happy if someone chooses them over us. They are fantastic companies to work with.
We can all agree to disagree, but my experience from mailing 40-80k pieces of direct mail annually in Southern California from 2012-2015 showed me I would be out of business if I continued to feed the beast. I had to find a more effective way to find deals for my business to survive and get creative. I am aware of successful wholesaling operations in B markets doing well with direct mail, but I also believe the trend is shifting away from direct mail and its effectiveness will continue to decline. We don't look to a mailbox for an answer to our problems, we pull out our phone.
I 100% agree with you that the trend is shifting away from direct mail but that doesn't mean that there aren't still deals to be had via direct mail. I live in Carlsbad so I am very familiar with your market and I can introduce you to investors in the area who are consistently buying deals from Direct Mail but they have found their niche in how it works. They have their list and their letter and postcard design that is working for them.
But you are 100% correct that direct mail effectiveness will continue to decline. It is very important for investors to have a balanced marketing approach but the only way to do that is if they have real numbers in front of them and have KPIs for each of their marketing strategies. There is no point in throwing money after Direct Mail or Online Marketing with the hopes that the deals will come.
I know investors in Dallas market who are doing really well with Radio advertisement and they have figured out what works for them and how to use it most efficiently. They absolutely hate Direct Mail and don't see any point in doing that because their ROI isn't worth it. You are right that in major cities that are super saturated, investors need to be more creative and Direct Mail is not the answer for them.
Like I said in my previous post to Cody, I am not in favor or against any particular marketing strategy but I believe in testing a few of them out and analyzing the KPIs and then making a decision on which one works and which one doesn't work as well.
Each investor needs to take a strategic approach and always be analyzing the numbers and that's the only way they can make an informed decision as to what works and what doesn't work.