@Justin Brin
Hey Justin, Coolest sheet here. Yeah, I've been down this road before myself doing these types of data analysis. But—lots of that data you're crunching? It's outdated - even though its up to data if you know what I mean where the trend has might have moved. Remember how Boise, Idaho looked like a gold mine where now it bounced back 180 degrees.
I usually hone in on column F for population change.
So, diving into the list: Oklahoma City. Not as vibrant (I have two Class C apartments there) as, say, Dallas or Houston. And Memphis, St. Louis, Kentucky... well, they're not exactly hotspots. Now, Indianapolis has some buzz about it in the north, but it's not booming like the southern cities.
And Ohio—Cincinnati, Columbus—doesn't seem to bounce back it will always be the Rustbelt... still, I've got some investments in Cleveland. Houston's a mosaic of markets, a behemoth really 4-5 of those other markets in one. It's about the submarkets there, dozens of them, not just the MSA-level view.
California? I steer clear.
Jacksonville and Dallas are on my good list—robust markets, even if they're oddly low on your list. Sorting criteria might need a tweak.
Atlanta's solid but pricey. Tampa, Florida? Watch out for those hurricanes, higher risk than Jacksonville. I get what you're doing with the data, but sometimes you've gotta step back. Pick a market not just by the numbers but by the people you're in it with.