@Carl Fischer I am learning about real estate, totally correct but I know about investments. And again totally correct the IRA publication you referenced mentions property 45 times and only mentions stock 15 times. But if you look at bottom of page 9 top of page 10, it clearly states property can't be contributed to the IRA but the funds can used to make the purchase which is what I said. as for holding it as a position, I was wrong I guess in theory if your IRA is large enough to purchase a property (which that word along has many meanings) you can sell what ya got to purchase it bearing in mind the strong limitations like the cash flow can't be another contribution because its passive income and IRA's as we know are funded with earned income or that this can't be personal property it has to be for an investment. As for the tax advantage, that would be the only thing I could think of that might have this make sense but then we'd have to start the conversation of liquidity and when you need to take RMD's.
@Dmitriy Fomichenko neither thing you sent me made sense. You just reinforced that you can't contribute beanie babies to an IRA and the second thing you sent me didn't mention owning a house in an IRA at all.
Im not here to start an argument, I apologize if something I said came across as wrong. At the end of the day all I can say is if you have no involvement with the property, it might be possible. As a fiduciary I would say speak to an accountant, they will know if the tax advantage makes sense but other than that it would not be my recommendation