@Dwayne George
I knew someone would chime in and tell you that this property meets or almost meets the X% rule. Please do not put too much (any) weight into this analysis. These so-called Rules of Dumb are not accurate across property class, geographic region, etc. 1.8% on this property is much different than 1.8% on a $30k house in the rust belt.
Personally, I think this was a good buy and I know the neighborhood, the street and the houses on the street. I do think market rent is closer to $900-950. However, it sounds like you inherited a long term tenant who did not have a lease and the property is at the top end of what they can afford. It’s a judgment call on keeping them at a lower rate (which you did) vs. pushing for market and risking vacancy. Look at it this way – if $825 is their price ceiling, they may/will be renters for a long time and will probably be long term in your property. As I shared with you before, a friend of mine in that market had the same renters for 13 years in a 3/2 in that price point.
The location of that property has no shortage of renters in that price point.
My only concern, which I shared earlier, would be capex. Make sure you have underwritten the replacement cost and remaining useful life of the major systems (roof, windows, hvac, hot water, kitchen appliances, flooring) and that you are funding for these. It’s a big purchase, so second guessing is normal, but you’ll be fine.