I dont know the law in Indiana, but in WI there is no disclosure requirement for "stigmatized" properties, and if say a murder happened at a home, unless the seller specifically wants you to tell buyers, you could be sued if you do, as it could affect the sale negatively, mold is a material adverse fact, an activity that once happened at the property is not material even though it may be adverse in some peoples minds, that is not for a seller or landlord to decide, sane minded people would find these things adverse as they do not affect the building or land.  

It will be easier for you to qualify for a rental somewhere else before your credit does become adversely affected by becoming late (if that is what is ultimately going to happen) 2.

It seems to me that any time a person of color has any kind of adverse event, and accusation of racism is not far behind.Each case needs to be examined individually to determine what the evidence is. 

The ability to declare adverse possession isn't simple and takes quite a long time to do so it isn't likely you would have to fight a squatter other than to kick him/her out.

If that's how you feel about the area & you are adverse to investing in D-Class neighborhoods I would recommend you park your money in a more stable neighborhood. 

I am not an attorney but have been plaintiff and defendant on this type of claim what ever that is worthits been over 15 years ago but it was using the Adverse possession laws in all my cases (and all prevailed as plaintiff) .

.- people who want to learn a specific skill such as lease options, syndication, tax deed sales, land trusts, land flipping, subject to, or other specific strategies that can be very technical and have an adverse legal consequences for doing things incorrectly.- people who have money to start investing and utilizing the strategies right away.

Not saying everyone doesn’t face adversity, but everyone hasn’t been up against the battle of poverty and oppression.

The extra compliance has all sorts of adverse issues that we could spend days and days talking about.  

It is still an "adverse outcome", and you have to put a letter in writing (according to the FCRA) explaining that adverse outcome, and offering that the applicant can dispute the credit report and get a free copy of the report.If you look at debt, and require a certain debt-to-income ratio, then that would not be discriminatory (as long as all applicants have to meet that same required DTI).But now you state that "she had obvious claims on her income that could jeopardize her ability to pay the rent" - is the evidence for that taken from the credit report, or is that based on counting bodies listed on the application?