Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Dennis Maynard

Dennis Maynard has started 12 posts and replied 289 times.

Post: Halloween Fun: Anyone Ever Own a Haunted Property?

Dennis MaynardPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 300
  • Votes 146

No, but there are many "haunted houses" here in LA including a couple hotels.  I'm putting together a video of Halloween houses on YouTube here in a little for fun.  Anyone want to watch?  

Post: First Purchase - Closing Costs

Dennis MaynardPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 300
  • Votes 146
Originally posted by @Steve Vaughan:
Originally posted by @Dennis Maynard:
Originally posted by @Steve Vaughan:
Originally posted by @Dennis Maynard:
Curious, are you getting market price or are you having to cut your pricing because buyers expect a discount when you sell by owner?  NAR stats suggest that FSBO owners receive substantially less (almost 30%).  In some of my recent observations of discount brokers and FSBO websites, the amount of web traffic and views they receive is 50% of what a real estate agent brings to the table.  So I'm curious on your experience.

Also, the taxes are prorated based on the sale date, but are customarily paid by the seller.  If the seller already paid the taxes, then there will be a credit from the buyer to the seller.  

Originally posted by @Steve Vaughan:
Originally posted by @Dennis Maynard:
Steve, every market has different customs.  As Aaron is buying he will not be paying taxes on the property, that's the sellers responsibility.  Commissions also fall to the seller unless otherwise negotiated with the buyer.  I always suggest that a buyer or a seller ask for a "draft" of their Settlement Statement from escrow, and use an agent to guide you through the negotiations so you are not paying for items that you don't need to.


Originally posted by @Steve Vaughan:
Originally posted by @Aaron Hunt:

Hey Guys, 

Really appreciate any responses and guidance here.

This is my first investment purchase, property is in Livermore California, and we are in closing.  As I type this,  I am reviewing the disclosures from the lender and I see the following:

Title - Closing/Settlement/Attorney Fee for $1,625 Title. The Purchase price is 656K

Question: Does this seem right? I am not sure what this fees is for and seems a bit high to me. (I will ask the lender, but I wanted to inform myself before I speak to them)

This seems completely reasonable for settlement fees.

The real fun begins with the lender.  If not direct, I'd expect your origination fee alone to be $6k.  Lender's insurance, more than $1000.  Doc prep and underwriting fees are worth sneezing at, too.   

Pre-paids will be a lot, but those are pre-paying interest, insurance, taxes, etc.  Commissions will be in the $10s of thousands as well.  The seller will 'pay' those, but the money came from you essentially. 

The fun is just beginning!

Interesting property taxes aren't prorated in your area.  

I agree new buyers are best represented by a good agent, but to say commissions aren't paid from buyer funds is a bit not right.  

I sell by owner often.  I ask at a price net of commissions, but if a buyer wants to be represented, they just add the commissions to the offer, a la carte  Some do and I am glad they do.  It makes it easier for me, but try to tell them their agent was free.   

They happily pay for their representation but aren't under the guise of commissions being 'seller-paid'. 

Selling by owner I net the same. I also am only selling mid-grade rentals that have punch list sweat equity needs. I would probably list my primary if selling that. That's where the 30% or whatever discount numbers are quoted. My FSBO rental sale was $250k, primary much higher. Stats say FSBOs sell for less.

An example of a rental I sold last year.  Completely beautiful and staged would list for $239k.  I sold by owner for $226 + agent and  closing cost help.  

The buyer had an agent and wanted $4k in closing costs so we settled at $239k plus  my buying a 1 year warranty of $500. I did more admin tasks  but got to pass some savings along to a first time buyer couple for not having  to fix the gate or gutters, repair the yard, replace the dishwasher, etc.

So do you think you would net more by getting more exposure if you listed?  I'm looking at these guys on discount sites and shaking my head... 

No, I wouldn't have netted more had I listed and it would've been a lot more work and indigestion getting it 'market ready'.   

FSBO attracted a flexible and tolerant buyer. I only had to give a $5k discount for an $11k roof replacement because the buyer was willing to do a lot of the work in exchange for having some equity going in. He had equity going in because there wasn't a LA to pay.

I've listed before, perfect and staged.  I had to go over 3x per week to close and lock the back door, turn off lights and the a/c etc as random agents and people looked at their leisure.  I also fell out of contract multiple times with financing and inspection issues.  Horrible experience I may be willing to go through on my primary but never again on a rental. 

So with regards to the agents and follow up, sounds like a lack of clear criteria to gain access to the property. Listing Agent responsibility. With inspections, I can't comment on without being a part of it. Financing issues should have been double checked prior to getting into escrow. Doesn't matter if FSBO or listed.

Listing a property doesn't always have to be market ready with perfect staging.  Sometimes it's just as simple as basic clean up.  Sorry to hear that.  

In LA, it absolutely makes a difference to list with an agent.  The exposure difference is massive.  Keep in touch, happy to answer questions if you have any. 

Post: Big Bear/ Lake Arrowhead fire risk?

Dennis MaynardPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 300
  • Votes 146

Nice house.  So yes, fire is a risk.  There is no way around it.  If you build your home next to water, it might flood.  If you own a home in California, you might have an earthquake.  If you buy a home in an area which has lots of native fires, you get the point.  There are natural disasters everywhere, tornados, hurricanes.. You can't get around it.  This is why we have insurance.  The best thing to do is always work for the best and prepare for the worst.  I love BB and Arrowhead.  AirBnB's did fantastic up there this past summer.  

I'm happy to help any way I can.  Here is a Env Hazard search map by CA.

Cal MyHazards - Environmental Hazards Search.

Post: First Purchase - Closing Costs

Dennis MaynardPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 300
  • Votes 146
Originally posted by @Steve Vaughan:
Originally posted by @Dennis Maynard:
Curious, are you getting market price or are you having to cut your pricing because buyers expect a discount when you sell by owner?  NAR stats suggest that FSBO owners receive substantially less (almost 30%).  In some of my recent observations of discount brokers and FSBO websites, the amount of web traffic and views they receive is 50% of what a real estate agent brings to the table.  So I'm curious on your experience.

Also, the taxes are prorated based on the sale date, but are customarily paid by the seller.  If the seller already paid the taxes, then there will be a credit from the buyer to the seller.  

Originally posted by @Steve Vaughan:
Originally posted by @Dennis Maynard:
Steve, every market has different customs.  As Aaron is buying he will not be paying taxes on the property, that's the sellers responsibility.  Commissions also fall to the seller unless otherwise negotiated with the buyer.  I always suggest that a buyer or a seller ask for a "draft" of their Settlement Statement from escrow, and use an agent to guide you through the negotiations so you are not paying for items that you don't need to.


Originally posted by @Steve Vaughan:
Originally posted by @Aaron Hunt:

Hey Guys, 

Really appreciate any responses and guidance here.

This is my first investment purchase, property is in Livermore California, and we are in closing.  As I type this,  I am reviewing the disclosures from the lender and I see the following:

Title - Closing/Settlement/Attorney Fee for $1,625 Title. The Purchase price is 656K

Question: Does this seem right? I am not sure what this fees is for and seems a bit high to me. (I will ask the lender, but I wanted to inform myself before I speak to them)

This seems completely reasonable for settlement fees.

The real fun begins with the lender.  If not direct, I'd expect your origination fee alone to be $6k.  Lender's insurance, more than $1000.  Doc prep and underwriting fees are worth sneezing at, too.   

Pre-paids will be a lot, but those are pre-paying interest, insurance, taxes, etc.  Commissions will be in the $10s of thousands as well.  The seller will 'pay' those, but the money came from you essentially. 

The fun is just beginning!

Interesting property taxes aren't prorated in your area.  

I agree new buyers are best represented by a good agent, but to say commissions aren't paid from buyer funds is a bit not right.  

I sell by owner often.  I ask at a price net of commissions, but if a buyer wants to be represented, they just add the commissions to the offer, a la carte  Some do and I am glad they do.  It makes it easier for me, but try to tell them their agent was free.   

They happily pay for their representation but aren't under the guise of commissions being 'seller-paid'. 

Selling by owner I net the same. I also am only selling mid-grade rentals that have punch list sweat equity needs. I would probably list my primary if selling that. That's where the 30% or whatever discount numbers are quoted. My FSBO rental sale was $250k, primary much higher. Stats say FSBOs sell for less.

An example of a rental I sold last year.  Completely beautiful and staged would list for $239k.  I sold by owner for $226 + agent and  closing cost help.  

The buyer had an agent and wanted $4k in closing costs so we settled at $239k plus  my buying a 1 year warranty of $500. I did more admin tasks  but got to pass some savings along to a first time buyer couple for not having  to fix the gate or gutters, repair the yard, replace the dishwasher, etc. 




So do you think you would net more by getting more exposure if you listed?  I'm looking at these guys on discount sites and shaking my head... 

Post: Contract template for Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)?

Dennis MaynardPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 300
  • Votes 146
Originally posted by @Bruce P.:

Great point, thanks @Dennis Maynard

We gotta get you out there and moving on stuff... 

Post: House Hacking in Greater Los Angeles under 500k

Dennis MaynardPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 300
  • Votes 146
Originally posted by @Pedro Cardoso:

Hi everyone! I recently moved to LA and I am looking for a property under 500k to house hack. I have already read past posts on this topic, but would be great to get refreshed views. What areas you recommend looking into that are not super sketchy?

For greater context, I work in downtown LA and I am prepared for a longer commute (ideally up to 1hr). Also I plan to do a 20% down payment (otherwise MI will kill my cash flow). Ideally, I am looking for a multi-family, but I understand that is difficult at this price point, so I am also looking at SFH. I am aware that LA is difficult to cash flow but I would like to get as close as possible. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated!

Best,

Pedro Cardoso

Hi Pedro,

I agree with much of what Jon is saying.  I would also ad there are other areas as well.  It will take some digging as most houses being sold at or under $500k are going into multiple offers.  As an example, I reached out to one this morning listed at $511k and it has multiples and already bid up to $560k.  It is an extremely competitive market right now.  I'm happy to answer questions.

Dennis

Post: Contract template for Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)?

Dennis MaynardPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 300
  • Votes 146
Originally posted by @Bruce P.:

Thanks @Dennis Maynard, I'm just doing some research - I assume a copy provided by the contractor would be heavily skewed.  @Paul Dashevsky - DM sent, thanks!

Contractors will use their own contracts always. That is not a discussion. Why would they surrender their rights to you who could simply not pay? For what you are talking about, an ADU, this is not a big enough contract for you to be fussing over the details and trying to play lawyer by writing your own. I'll be honest, you are spending a lot of time in the weeds and not enough time in the forest. Get out there and get one done. And if there is something you don't like in a contract, ask the contractor to strike or amend it. Just a suggestion.

Post: Alternatives to a real estate agent when selling to tenant

Dennis MaynardPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 300
  • Votes 146
I still laugh at people who want to call a plumber to fix their car.  Go to the people who do it all the time and have the tools and equipment to get a job done correctly.

Debbie, call an agent broker and offer them a flat fee to write up the documentation on the transaction.  An Attorney will write up a PSA agreement, sure, but they may not cover all the disclosures you need to make to a buyer to alleviate you of any future lawsuits.  EVEN though they currently occupy the property.  An agent / broker can do that.  

If you need a referral, let me know.  


Originally posted by @David Lee Hall, III:

@Debbie Cost

Ugh, you have a buyer, you don’t need an agent or broker. Find a Settlement company or lawyer (depending if you have state that requires lawyers) that will provide a simple contract with your terms and then execute the transaction.

Post: First Purchase - Closing Costs

Dennis MaynardPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 300
  • Votes 146
Curious, are you getting market price or are you having to cut your pricing because buyers expect a discount when you sell by owner?  NAR stats suggest that FSBO owners receive substantially less (almost 30%).  In some of my recent observations of discount brokers and FSBO websites, the amount of web traffic and views they receive is 50% of what a real estate agent brings to the table.  So I'm curious on your experience.

Also, the taxes are prorated based on the sale date, but are customarily paid by the seller.  If the seller already paid the taxes, then there will be a credit from the buyer to the seller.  

Originally posted by @Steve Vaughan:
Originally posted by @Dennis Maynard:
Steve, every market has different customs.  As Aaron is buying he will not be paying taxes on the property, that's the sellers responsibility.  Commissions also fall to the seller unless otherwise negotiated with the buyer.  I always suggest that a buyer or a seller ask for a "draft" of their Settlement Statement from escrow, and use an agent to guide you through the negotiations so you are not paying for items that you don't need to.


Originally posted by @Steve Vaughan:
Originally posted by @Aaron Hunt:

Hey Guys, 

Really appreciate any responses and guidance here.

This is my first investment purchase, property is in Livermore California, and we are in closing.  As I type this,  I am reviewing the disclosures from the lender and I see the following:

Title - Closing/Settlement/Attorney Fee for $1,625 Title. The Purchase price is 656K

Question: Does this seem right? I am not sure what this fees is for and seems a bit high to me. (I will ask the lender, but I wanted to inform myself before I speak to them)

This seems completely reasonable for settlement fees.

The real fun begins with the lender.  If not direct, I'd expect your origination fee alone to be $6k.  Lender's insurance, more than $1000.  Doc prep and underwriting fees are worth sneezing at, too.   

Pre-paids will be a lot, but those are pre-paying interest, insurance, taxes, etc.  Commissions will be in the $10s of thousands as well.  The seller will 'pay' those, but the money came from you essentially. 

The fun is just beginning!

Interesting property taxes aren't prorated in your area.  

I agree new buyers are best represented by a good agent, but to say commissions aren't paid from buyer funds is a bit not right.  

I sell by owner often.  I ask at a price net of commissions, but if a buyer wants to be represented, they just add the commissions to the offer, a la carte  Some do and I am glad they do.  It makes it easier for me, but try to tell them their agent was free.   

They happily pay for their representation but aren't under the guise of commissions being 'seller-paid'. 

Post: First Purchase - Closing Costs

Dennis MaynardPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 300
  • Votes 146
Steve, every market has different customs.  As Aaron is buying he will not be paying taxes on the property, that's the sellers responsibility.  Commissions also fall to the seller unless otherwise negotiated with the buyer.  I always suggest that a buyer or a seller ask for a "draft" of their Settlement Statement from escrow, and use an agent to guide you through the negotiations so you are not paying for items that you don't need to.


Originally posted by @Steve Vaughan:
Originally posted by @Aaron Hunt:

Hey Guys, 

Really appreciate any responses and guidance here.

This is my first investment purchase, property is in Livermore California, and we are in closing.  As I type this,  I am reviewing the disclosures from the lender and I see the following:

Title - Closing/Settlement/Attorney Fee for $1,625 Title. The Purchase price is 656K

Question: Does this seem right? I am not sure what this fees is for and seems a bit high to me. (I will ask the lender, but I wanted to inform myself before I speak to them)

This seems completely reasonable for settlement fees.

The real fun begins with the lender.  If not direct, I'd expect your origination fee alone to be $6k.  Lender's insurance, more than $1000.  Doc prep and underwriting fees are worth sneezing at, too.   

Pre-paids will be a lot, but those are pre-paying interest, insurance, taxes, etc.  Commissions will be in the $10s of thousands as well.  The seller will 'pay' those, but the money came from you essentially. 

The fun is just beginning!