I agree with @Teri Feeney Styers that this came up quickly. Regardless of your political agenda, it is something every resort town is trying to navigate to keep the economies moving. I live in Frisco, Colorado, and they are looking at employee incentives but have no restrictions. Unincorporated Summit County had 90 vacancies they couldn't fill with the primary reason as affordable housing... They are actually offering up to $24,000 for a year long lease to locals for a 3BR place. That is great money for investors that can covert from STR to LTR. So incentives are working better than disincentives. Places that offer disincentives, like Breckenridge where homeowners had less than 2 months to understand there won't be any more STR license if you sell, saw an increase in everyone getting a license "just in case" and have seen all property values go down. There is an argument that slowing property values in this insane housing market isn't going to really hurt anyone but the rich, but there have been several people speaking up that they use the STR to afford their mortgage, so rather than hurting investors are they hurting the people trying to make it work in an expensive market? Are they encouraging people to just buy and sit on their properties instead?
There is a fine balance of government's role keeping the town running and invading property rights. I do think there are plenty of opportunities in the outskirts of resort towns for both price and STR regulations, but you take a hit on the income. Evergreen and Conifer are nice, but not in demand year round.