Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Bryan Hartlen

Bryan Hartlen has started 27 posts and replied 265 times.

Post: Limited Partner terms?

Bryan HartlenPosted
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 270
  • Votes 133
Quote from @Justin Moy:

...

I've also seen it be more common for equity to readjust at certain hurdles. Common would be 70/30 investor / GP split with anything above a certain IRR or equity multiple readjusts to 50/50. Personally I don't care for that structure but it's becoming more common.

Thanks Justin - why don't you like the tiered structure?  Seems like a good way to drive more returns for the GP for exceptional returns (after fulfilling the proforma baseline).

Post: Limited Partner terms?

Bryan HartlenPosted
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 270
  • Votes 133
Quote from @Chris Seveney:

....If you need to raise funds from investors not in your network you may need to offer sweeter terms than having a deep investor base to get them to invest in your deal over other deals

Chris, our first objective is to make sure we offer our previous investors something that is competitive with the market.  But you make a good point that we've been mulling that over... our raise may be beyond our current investor pool's available resources.  

Post: Limited Partner terms?

Bryan HartlenPosted
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 270
  • Votes 133
Quote from @Gerardo Waisbaum:

Hi Bryan,

Based on our experience and the expectations of our LP investors, we have structured our deals with the following criteria:

Minimum IRR: We aim for a minimum IRR of 15%.
Average CoC Return: Our target average CoC return is 20% per year for 5-year plans, resulting in a total of 100% over the holding period.
Minimum Preferred Return: We offer a minimum preferred return of 7% to our LP investors.

Regarding depreciation, we actively share the depreciation benefits, including cost segregation, bonus depreciation, and other tax strategies, with our investors.

Good luck!

Thank you Gerardo.  Do you include the depreciation benefits in your IRR or CoC projections or is it let as an unquantified bonus?   

Post: Limited Partner terms?

Bryan HartlenPosted
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 270
  • Votes 133

Hi all. We’re putting together an opportunity on a mid-sized MF apartment. We’d like to structure this as a GP/LP opportunity. This will not be the first MF deal we’ve done, but it would be the first one we’ve structured this way and new for our private investors. I’m looking for your thoughts and opinions on what you’d find compelling as an offering in terms of the following:

- minimum IRR

- average CoC return

- minimum preferred return

- preference for share or operating cashflow compared to equity share (how much cashflow split, if any, would you forego for a larger share of equity split? Or visa-versa?).

- would a share of the depreciation expense be interesting?

Thank you for your thoughts and opinions.

Post: Analyzing MF asset with assumable loan

Bryan HartlenPosted
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 270
  • Votes 133

@Scott Moore we tried this recently but we assumed that the assumed loan would stay in first position and that we wouldn’t find another lender willing to be in second position (or wouldn’t be allowed by the first position lender)… so the balance would have to be covered by our members capital raise and would be paid out according to those terms. When we entered the assumable loan, we kept the current principal, rate and payment amount by tweaking the term, and set the down payment to 0, so the cash flow numbers would work.

@Brian Lucier I haven’t built a syndication but my understanding is that….

preferred returns are like simple interest. In your example you’d pay the investors $8k per year. Distributions can be monthly, quarterly (or however frequently you specify). As you noted it’s paid first from any cashflow (after expenses, after debt service) and before any cashflow distributions that are offer shard between LP and GPs.

Post: Question about lease agreements.

Bryan HartlenPosted
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 270
  • Votes 133

@Matt Waggoner I’d recommend consulting a lawyer but 

- you should be able to do this. Our property management company signs leases on our company’s behalf all the time. I don’t know if this is because they are Legal registered agents (hence check with a lawyer)

- would also suggest you make sure you are aware of the risks you are accepting when/if you want our properties that are in your personal name and not an LLC.(check with a lawyer if you're not sure of the risks).

- if you can swing it, you may want to consider keeping tenants on MTM for a couple months until you’re sure you want them long term. 

Good luck!


@Kevin Morgan I'm no expert so treat this comment accordingly… but I think you answered the question yourself. You're selling a business so use the STR/MTR cash flow. As long as you include the unique capex costs for the furnishings in the pro forma I would think the model should hold. Prior to this year's market adjustments, we had seen some lenders loan on the NOI of STR income streams (which put the property's value well above traditional LTR comps). So I think the logic holds.

@John B. I think you’ll find that the answer to the question is that it depends. It depends on
- how good your local team is (or how good you are at building a team)
- how organized you are - when you’re not there to see things you need to be more thorough in the questions and processes you use to ensure you are getting the property, rehab and tenants that you expect
- how well you are buying your properties - there is a greater opportunity for mistakes so you need more cushion
- your personality: do you need to know every micro level aspect of the project or are you comfortable managing it at a macro level
We've bought 10 value-add SFR properties without every seeing them. We've kept 5 and flipped 4. Our first few we're more bumpy than our last few as our processes have improved. That said, you were asking about purchasing 3 - 10 units…. We're currently looking to move into small MF space (10 - 40 units) and our plan is that we would physically visit the property during due diligence to get everything set up and to increase the odds that we quickly identify more of the differences between SF and MF investments.

That is the investor's issue. From your end it's just money. You don't care whether it's IRA or after tax money. You just make sure that you pay returns to the entity you received the funds from.