@Barry Rupisan - you are likely seeing that they are a flat fee and pretty inexpensive, what I know is that their system is heavy on technology that allows them to do more with less direct interaction with the tenants.

First of all, I would say, don't get distracted looking for technology to help you.

There are obviously attribution rules for these purposes.The "control test" is met for the "majority" of the tax year.The businesses share the same tax year.None of the businesses may be SSTBs [Specified Service Trade or Business].The businesses to be aggregated much satisfy two of the following three factors: They must provide products or services that are the same or customarily offered together;They must share facilities or significant centralized business elements, such as personnel, accounting, legal, manufacturing, purchasing, human resources, or information technology resources; orThe businesses are operated in coordination with, or reliance upon, one or more of the businesses in the aggregated group."

Especially with today's technology everyone just thinks they can find anything and everything they need online.

I personally have a RothIRA and am invested in a science and technology mutual fund and an index fund.

I have to think about if I am comfortable and have the time/ability to manage a multifamily out of state given that I work 70+ hours per week, but given all the technological advantages you mentioned, you make it sound easy.Nonetheless, not sure if your property is located in an A/B neighborhood, but the IRRs I'm trying to achieve likely place me squarely in C neighborhoods where dealing with tenants may require a good PM.Apart from Transunion, do you use any services for a background check?

That really allowed us to take leverage technology.

This means they are not professional enough to care to improve what they do, and you run the risk of not getting the advantage of the latest information for investors - such as new laws, common practices, new technology, or professional education opportunities. 2) How are their online reviews?  

Their website basically shows they have all the same features as showmojo, so I'd guess I'd have been happy going with them as well.I'll also be trying out the self-show codeboxes that integrate with either platform - I know many PMs don't care for the idea of using these self show boxes, but I'm a sucker for technology and if they might provide a potential for shorter vacancies, and increased prospect and personal convenience, I'm willing to test them out.

You'll need to do more than one fund to justify the costs.As others have mentioned in different threads, the sponsors are typically using the technology to more efficiently process their existing investors and the new investors simply complement them.