Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago, 02/13/2022

User Stats

477
Posts
476
Votes
Brian Schmelzlen
  • Accountant
  • La Mesa, CA
476
Votes |
477
Posts

Bad News for Buy and Hold Residential Investors

Brian Schmelzlen
  • Accountant
  • La Mesa, CA
Posted

For the past 8 months, tax professionals have been studying Section 199A (the 20% pass-through business deduction) and trying to position their clients to best be able to maximize their deduction.  However, we have been operating without any regulations providing guidance on how the deduction will operate.

Because of last minute changes made to the Tax Cuts and Job Act (the 2017 tax reform law), many assumed that rental real estate would qualify for the Section 199A deduction.  However, that was just an assumption, and yesterday the IRS finally issued proposed regulations providing clarity.  The bad news: under these proposed regulations most rental activities will not qualify.

Here is the problem: the deduction applies to qualified business income from a qualified "trade or business".  We were waiting to hear how, for purposes of Section 199A only, the IRS would define a trade or business.  Rather than coming up with a new definition that would be helpful for real estate investors, they decided to use Section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code to define it.

There has been quite a few court cases over the years defining a "trade or business" under Section 162, and in a lot of cases rental real estate does not qualify.  The courts will look at a lot of factors, but to oversimplify things if you report the activity on Schedule E of your individual tax return rather than on Schedule C, it doesn't count.

Now, some of you may be wondering about if you own a significant number of rental properties and operate them like a business.  Even in that case it probably won't help.  The issue is that the IRS indicated that each property would be evaluated independently, not in the aggregate, so having more properties doesn't help.  Additionally, the IRS did not provide an exception for those it classifies as real estate professionals.

There is one carve-out, and it is for self-rentals.  If a business is renting property, and there is a common owner to both the business and the property, that activity qualifies for the deduction.

So, this is bad news for buy and hold investors.  However, it is not bad for all real estate investors.  My understanding is that flippers and short-term vacation rentals (that operate more like a bed and breakfast, rather than a pure rental) will still qualify for the deduction. 

Loading replies...