Guys, that's pretty harsh and liberal-like to lash out personally against someone you disagree with.

You could try a phone call but expect a back lash.

Even if the tenancy law in your jurisdiction is very explicit about obligations, our observation has been a magistrate is likely to take a paternalistic position vis-a-vie the tenant; give them a tongue lashing; and let them off the hook ... very much like the scenario you described.That is precisely why I advocate working with the tenant rather than being pedantic about the terms of the lease.

You just might get a couple mean responses lashing back at you but so what!!!

Can I create a 99 year ground lease with only a non disturb agreement and no subornation agreement. basically have a teanant have all the benefits of the property with out any back lash of the owners financial responsibility.

You don't like any of this advice and you lash out at the messenger.

I know that isn't my problem, but it's the reality and if they feel that i'm putting them in a desperate situation they could lash out in any number of ways.

Fools and thieves justly receive lashes from the whip and blows to the back not a purse of sIlver coins to leave town .

It's obvious that you prefer to lash out at me as opposed to taking responsibility for your negativity.  

I know this doesn't sound all that sexy, but it will pay you long term dividends and keep you on the straight and narrow.Ok Bill, I'm ready for my tongue lashing.