Brittany Gamble was mine and she was amazing as well. 

Subject to a temporary financial issue, which would be gambling, it is at a ceiling for value growth.B.  

It is a bit of a gamble. 

I haven't done foundation work, but figured it's worth the gamble on this property. 

I gambled on the water restricting supply.

Boosting existing property values , and thus household wealth, in lower middle class neighborhoods and giving the construction sector a chance to possibly rebound will really ignite a regional economic recovery.Another area I'd like to see some creative thought on is on getting long term vacant commercial repurposed or demo'd.

It is gambling.

It is not to say section 8 is bad, it is just to big of a gamble for our system We have a very strict screening and placement policy, obviously all within the equal housing parameters.  

But predicting what part of the city will transition from high crime with large levels of abandoned houses to a great area to live is more of a gambling game.  

I don't know enough about this, and it sounds like a gamble to me.Use equity in my existing home to invest in a rental property (but this sounds like a scheme where I would take a HELOC for a down payment on an investment, to be able to take out MORE debt, meaning I have to rent or sell the investment property for even MORE money to cover increased debt costs).So, are any of these options better than the others?