Ok, I found the answer. It's all here in the nolo.com article entitled
LLCs and Limited Liability Protection: A 50-State Guide
I cannot verify the accuracy of the information within, but I'm inclined to believe it. I'll summarize the key points:
1. An LLC does protect my personal assets if my partner or an employee is negligent and/or causes the LLC to be named in a suit. Essentially, it protects me from my partners and employees negligent actions.
2. The LLC DOESNT protect my assets if I personally am found negligent and the LLC is sued. This part is important and is the part I didn't know. It is my understanding that if I fail to maintain a property and a tenant falls and is injured, it could be established that I was negligent and therefore I could be held personally liable for damages paid to the injured party. Basically, if I do anything negligent or illegal, the LLC won't protect me. That makes sense, but I guess I always thought (incorrectly) that even if I somehow unintentionally ended up being negligent that the most I could be on the hook for is the max value of my position in the LLC. I was wrong.
So, for a smaller scale investor like myself, it seems like an LLC doesn't protect me very well at all. I guess it's a small amount of protection if my partner were to do something wrong, but for me, personably, it doesn't seem like there's much difference whether I'm in an LLC or not. That might change someday if we end up having employees. Then the LLC protection would become instantly immensely valuable.
For single member owners, it almost seems like you'd have no protections unless you have employees.