I guess I should also mention that I'm intending on renting to section 8 tenants in a city where there are pockets of crime such as drugs and gangs. I'll be trying my best to improve those areas by buying into the transition zone neighborhoods and providing safe, quality housing. But to make that happen, I'm anticipating a need to screen below age 18.
Perhaps in some areas this type of juvenile screening may be unnecessary but in my target area crime is a real potential. I think I can weed it out with careful screening, but if I don't background check, then I'd be just taking a chance.
All the things I've read say that meticulous tenant screening is ESSENTIAL. I know numerous investors who have skimped on screening and they've been burned. In fact, I honestly don't know anyone personally who screens tenants well. But all of the 10+ landlords I know personally skimp on screening and they struggle chronically with tenants causing problems and not paying. As a renter for years myself, the only times I've been personally background checked were twice when I rented from apartment complexes. None of my SFH or duplex landlords have ever run a check on me, even when I rented in a very bad neighborhood. My in-building neighbors there did drugs, didn't pay regularly, and the guy upstairs wore a police leg parole gps tracker. Super nice guy to me, but clearly had some serious criminal history and I know was a cocaine user and pot smoker while I was there. He was nice, but I don't want to be his landlord. Lol.
I wonder if anyone else rents to tenants in potential high crime areas. Do you screen minors?