Originally posted by Tim Wieneke:
Owen,
I just realized something thinking about Darwin and racism. I know why racism persisted for 200 years even after the first anti-slavery laws were passed in America. Racism was "scientifically proven" to be correct at that time. "Science" is one of the hardest things to correct. It's hard to the point of ridiculous and certain people's faith-based devotion to "science" rivals the most fanatical of religious zealots. Science still refers to Newton's "Laws" even though Einstein's "Theories" have disproven some of Newton's "Laws". Reading some of the history on this, you begin envisioning the orangutans in Planet of the Apes covering their eyes and ears and yelling about "Scientific Heresy".
Your right about science and slavery . . . back then it was common to think that you can tell a person's personality by the shape, size, configuration of someones head/ skull . . which just sounds ridiculous today right but the people who were in charge had no laws to prevent them from exploiting the people already in bondage so that only made the situation worse for the enslaved although they weren't the only ones being used as guinea pigs.
Thats why i said science and faith can and should coexist, if you take a step back and look at both scientists and believers in faith what it comes down to is their strive to make the world a better place. Science tries to do this through the creation of drugs, experimentation and theories but all of those start in some person's head.
similarly with religious believers they want to make the world a better place through compassion and caring for your fellow human. They give time, services, and hope.
different approaches but both cause in my eyes are noble and deserve some credit for where we are in the world today.
throughout history we see where faith lead people to do great things, mother theresa, ghandi, martin luther equally we've seen science do great things such as the curing so many diseases and generally keeping people alive longer and in better health.
on the other side we've seen people use the guise of faith to lead people to do crazy things . . . no names need to be named but i'm sure we all know at least one and we've seen the scientific method used to create weapons that can destroy the world many times over, create new diseases right.
so we can say well religion is better than science and visa versa but what does that mean, under what context, how can we quantify "better"?
So this is just acknowledgement that there's more to the issue than is often debated and if we have extremist on either side not letting go or willing to examine what they are holding on to then nothing gets done.