@Sabrina Brown based on what I have read so far you purchased these properties for approximately $215,000 and have had repairs over the last five years of $20,000 but have had 9 months of vacancy (I gather vacancy was intentional while trying to sell.) you have invested little or none of your own money and have netted $1000 a month for 50 months .
$50K less $20k in repairs is still a decent return since you had not cash of your own invested. Am I missing something?
Yes you overpaid for the property but I am only guessing that if you have a 15 year 6% mortgage you will own the property outright in another 10 years while continuing to reap a positive cash flow.
Your solution is to find competent management because turnover, vacancy and repair will eat up that $1000 cash flow quickly.
There are many blogs about investment property and the 2% 50% rule and your property would fall short but depending on your goals it can still work to your advantage.
Selling and moving on of course is your other option and I don't know your market well enough to evaluate this but I do know you spent 9 months spinning your wheels trying to sell your property at 25% below what you perceive as its value. Apparently you have been mislead or your property would have been sold.
I am a buy and hold investor. I invest cash to generate income. The "market value" of a property is less important than its cash flow. I do not use leverage but in your case leverage is serving you well. If you stay the course and my assumptions are correct you will have built future income for yourself with little or no cash outlay .
This is how I view your situation. I would not sell but that's just me. If the post is to discusses the merits of Turn Key investments. I am happy to have that conversation.
I invest out of state and have put together my own portfolio. I did not go the turn key route . You could have done better but all things considered you could have done much worse.
4