Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: KC Pake

KC Pake has started 17 posts and replied 166 times.

Post: Owner financed a 11 plex, rolled commission into the deal as part of the down

KC Pake
Lender
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Orange Park, FL
  • Posts 169
  • Votes 106

Fantastic deal, Jerry!  This sounds like an awesome investment.  Your hard work and action seems to be paying off. 

Cheers,
KC

Post: 🤔 Seeking Advice: Combining Adjoining Waterfront Lots - Pros & Cons?

KC Pake
Lender
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Orange Park, FL
  • Posts 169
  • Votes 106

Hello everyone,

I'm in the process of deciding the best course of action for selling my property, and I could use your collective wisdom or experiences on this matter. I own four adjoining vacant lots, each approximately 0.65 acres in size, making up a total of 2.5 acres. These lots are all waterfront properties, providing about 325 feet of navigable waterfront access. Each lot is zoned Single Family Residential.

Here's my dilemma: I am considering whether I should formally combine these lots into one large parcel before selling, or if it's better to keep them as separate entities. I intend to sell all four lots together as a package deal, regardless of whether they're combined or separate.

Pros of Combining Lots:

- Simplified Selling Process: Potentially easier to sell one large parcel than multiple smaller ones.

- Increased Marketability: A larger, single lot may appeal to buyers looking for more space and privacy.

- Potential for Higher Value: Combining the lots could increase the overall value due to the larger size and unified waterfront access.

Cons of Combining Lots:

- Limiting Buyer Pool: Some buyers may be interested in smaller, less expensive parcels.

- Zoning and Regulation Challenges: Combining lots could complicate zoning and what can be built on the property.

- Costs and Legalities: There may be costs and legal procedures involved in combining the lots officially with the county.

I'm leaning towards combining them for the simplicity and the unique appeal it could offer to a certain market segment. However, I am concerned about potentially narrowing the pool of interested buyers or encountering unforeseen legal and zoning challenges.

If anyone here has gone through a similar decision-making process or has expertise in real estate, particularly with waterfront properties, I would appreciate your insights. What are the pros and cons you've experienced or observed with combining lots? Are there any pitfalls or advantages I might not have considered?

Thank you in advance for your advice and experiences, I look forward to your responses.

Best regards,
KC

Post: Our 3rd Investment Property - Which Exit strategy?

KC Pake
Lender
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Orange Park, FL
  • Posts 169
  • Votes 106
Quote from @Tony Pellettieri:

We have our 3rd Property under contract and plan to close in a week. The house is in a high appreciation area. Trying to figure out what the best exit strategy is. We are open to suggestions for different strategies than we're currently considering. We've been told seller financing may be a good option and we're open, just don't know how it would all play out, please advise.

We plan on paying cash for Acquisition & Repairs. This would be our first DSCR loan, and while I believe I have an idea of how it will all play out, looking forward to seeing the process.

Initial thoughts when putting property under contract were [repair, Rent, DSCR c/o, hold]. We will be taking possession with renters in place that are currently paying $750 a month. The plan is to wait to give them notice until day of closing, as requested by the seller. Rehab timeline less than 1 month after they vacate.

Now considering letting them stay, raising rent to $900/mo, completing minimal repairs as the house is currently in acceptable shape to them & good condition overall, DSCR c/o on a lower ARV. Will need to increase reserves going this route to account for future repairs. This will require less cash invested, shorter time frame to complete, and more cash we take from the deal.

Exit Strategy 1 - Have current Renters vacate, complete SOW, get new renters @ market rent, cash out on max ARV, HOLD.

ARV: 126,000

Acquisition: $60,251+ Closing $925

SOW Budget: $15,750

Rent after Rehab: $1,000

DSCR c/o $100,600 Loan @ 7.5% 30yr LTV80%: $840 PITI + Fees +/- $4000 (2pts+undw/orig/leg)

Cash Flow: $160 before Reserves

Cash Out - Cash In - Fees: $19,674 (100,600-60,251-925-15,750-4000)

Exit Strategy 2 - Have current Renters stay, complete light SOW, raise rent, cash out on lower ARV, HOLD.

ARV: 110,000

Acquisition: $60,251+ Closing $925

SOW Budget: $2,500

Increased Rent: $900

DSCR c/o $88,000 Loan @ 7.5% 30yr LTV80%: $752 PITI + Fees +/- $3800 (pts+undw/orig/leg)

Cash Flow: $148 before Reserves

Cash Out - Cash In - Fees: $20,524 (88,000-60,251-925-2,500-3800)

Hi Tony - 

Congratulations on your third investment property!  You have a lot going on here.  Let's break things down, hopefully, I am understanding everything correctly...

Exit Strategy 1: Full Rehab and Rent Increase


Pros:

Higher ARV (After Repair Value): This strategy could potentially increase the property's value to $126,000, allowing for a higher cash-out refinance amount.
Higher Rent: After the completion of the Scope of Work (SOW), the rent could be raised to $1,000, generating more monthly revenue.
Long-Term Value: Completing a full rehab could increase the property's long-term value and appeal, making it more competitive in the market.

Cons:
Higher Initial Investment: The SOW budget is significantly higher at $15,750, requiring more cash upfront.
Vacancy Risk: Asking the current renters to vacate for the rehab introduces the risk of vacancy and lost rental income during the renovation period.
Longer Timeline: The rehab process and finding new tenants could extend the timeline before the property starts generating its anticipated cash flow.

Exit Strategy 2: Minimal Repairs and Keeping Current Renters

Pros:
Lower Initial Investment: With a SOW budget of just $2,500, this strategy requires less cash upfront.
Quicker Turnaround: Completing minimal repairs and keeping the current tenants can significantly shorten the timeline to start generating cash flow.
Reduced Vacancy Risk: By allowing the current tenants to stay, the property continues to generate income, avoiding the risks associated with vacancy.

Cons:
Lower ARV: This strategy results in a lower ARV of $110,000, which affects the cash-out refinance amount.
Lower Rent Increase: The rent increase to $900 is less than what could be achieved with a full rehab.
Future Repair Costs: Minimal repairs might not address all the property's needs, potentially leading to higher maintenance costs down the line.

Financial Analysis:


Cash Flow Considerations: Both strategies provide positive cash flow before reserves, with Strategy 1 generating $160 and Strategy 2 generating $148 monthly. The difference is relatively minor, suggesting that the immediate cash flow impact of either strategy is not drastically different.
Cash Out - Cash In - Fees: Strategy 2 offers a slightly higher net cash after refinancing and expenses ($20,524) compared to Strategy 1 ($19,674). This suggests that Strategy 2 is slightly more efficient in terms of initial capital recovery.

Recommendations:


Goal Alignment: Choose the strategy that best aligns with your long-term investment goals. If maximizing property value and securing higher rents is the priority, Strategy 1 might be preferable. If minimizing upfront costs and avoiding vacancy is more important, Strategy 2 could be the better choice.
Market Considerations: Research the rental market in the area. If there's a strong demand for high-quality rentals, investing in a full rehab could position the property more competitively.
Financial Flexibility: Consider your financial flexibility and risk tolerance. Strategy 1 requires more upfront investment and carries a higher risk of vacancy but offers higher potential returns. Strategy 2 is less risky in the short term but might require additional investment later.

Ultimately, the choice between these strategies should consider both the financial implications and the investor's personal objectives, including risk tolerance, investment horizon, and the importance of generating immediate versus long-term value.

Best of luck with your decisions - these are good options to have  😊

Have a great weekend,
KC

Post: Need Advice- Too Expensive Bathroom Repairs

KC Pake
Lender
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Orange Park, FL
  • Posts 169
  • Votes 106
Quote from @Wendy Black:

We're in Phoenix and have owned a rental in Oceanside for quite a few years. It's a beautiful home (in Rancho Del Oro) and hasn't been vacant a day, but we've had several issues through the years with the plumbing. We were told it was construction in the entire subdivision. This time it's the tub that's rocking in the master bathroom on the second floor. We're told it wasn't installed correctely. It looked as if it just had to be regrouted, but no. One vendor quoted us $11k-$15k to demo it and do the necessary repairs and bring it up to code. We thought of having it converted to a one-piece acrylic or fiberglass shower and called Home Depot. They're still around the $15k.

Between paying for a family emergency and some remodeling on another rental, we literally can't afford it at this point. We were hoping we could've just done it for about $4k. (Yes, I know it's more expensive in SoCal.) We owe about $130k on this home that's worth north of $900k. We're not keen on getting a second mortgage. While we're raising the rent by a couple of hundred dollars, it's not even paying for the hefty repairs last year. 

My first question is does anyone know of someone more reasonably priced in the area who could come out and give the PM a lower quote? I suppose we could leave it as-is for the time being and not raise their rent by the $200 we had planned to until we could afford to repair it. There is another bathroom in the house. I certainly don't want to run up another $20k on a charge. We discussed selling or doing a 1031, but the commission would be about $50k, and we don't want to lose that now. 

Any ideas?

Thanks.

Hi Wendy,

Balancing the need for significant repairs with financial constraints is tough, especially in the current real estate and economic climate. Here are a few ideas that might help you navigate this situation:

Explore Financing Options: While you've mentioned not being keen on a second mortgage, there might be other financing options available. For example, a home equity line of credit (HELOC) might offer a more flexible solution to fund the repair without the commitment of a second mortgage. Alternatively, some contractors offer financing plans that could spread the cost over time.  You could also consider unsecured term loan options and zero percent credit cards depending on your credit profile and income.

Temporary Fixes: If a full repair isn't feasible right now, you might consider temporary solutions. This could involve making the tub safe and usable without a full renovation. While this isn't a long-term solution, it could buy you time to arrange finances for a complete fix.

Insurance Claim: If the issue with the tub is due to improper installation, it's worth checking if this is something that your homeowner’s insurance or a builder's warranty (if still valid) might cover.

Partial Renovation: Instead of a full demolition and remodel, consider if there's a way to repair the tub area without a complete overhaul. Sometimes, partial renovations can be significantly cheaper while still resolving the main issues.

Rent Adjustment Considerations: If you decide not to raise the rent to cover the cost of repairs, communicate clearly with your tenants about the situation. Tenants often appreciate transparency and may be more understanding of future rent increases if they are aware of the property's maintenance challenges.

Consider a Sale or 1031 Exchange: While you've expressed concerns about commission costs, it might be worth re-evaluating the long-term benefits versus the immediate costs. If the property is consistently requires expensive repairs, selling it and reinvesting in a less problematic property through a 1031 exchange could be more financially beneficial in the long run.

Remember, each option has its pros and cons, and the best choice depends on your specific financial situation and long-term investment strategy.

Best of luck,
KC

Post: Starting Out in Montana

KC Pake
Lender
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Orange Park, FL
  • Posts 169
  • Votes 106
Quote from @Chloe Westwood:

I'm excited to learn from this platform and all the members available to me!

I don't find a lot of Montanans; I'm interested in building a great team so I can begin wholesaling and finding short- and mid-term rentals in both Montana and Arizona!

Welcome to the forum, Chloe!

It's great to hear about your interest in real estate, especially in markets like Montana and Arizona. I have properties in the Flathead Valley, Montana, and I have experience with both short-term rentals (STRs) and mid-term rentals (MTRs) here. While I'm more familiar with the Montana market, I'm always happy to connect and share insights or answer any specific questions you might have about this area.

As for Arizona, I'm not as well-versed, but this platform is full of knowledgeable members who might be able to help. In the meantime, if you're looking to build a team for wholesaling and managing rentals, focusing on networking and connecting with others in these regions can be highly beneficial.

Feel free to reach out if you want to discuss anything related to the Montana market. I'm also excited to learn from this platform and looking forward to exchanging knowledge with you and other members!

Best of luck with your real estate ventures in both Montana and Arizona!

KC

Post: New Investor in the Jacksonville area

KC Pake
Lender
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Orange Park, FL
  • Posts 169
  • Votes 106
Quote from @Cassie Tarter:

Looking for seasoned investors in the Jacksonville/St. Johns area.  I am new to Florida and trying to navigate the market to find cash flow deals.  Thank you!

Hi Cassie,

Welcome to BiggerPockets & Welcome to Jacksonville, FL!  Below are some links to other forum threads that discuss real estate investing in and around Jacksonville.  Feel free to send me a message if you have specific questions after reading through the messages.

Jacksonville Thread #1

Jacksonville Thread #2

Jacksonville Thread #3

Cheers,
KC

Post: Adding Washer And Dryer

KC Pake
Lender
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Orange Park, FL
  • Posts 169
  • Votes 106
Quote from @Larry Landry:

I just recently purchased a single family hoping to fetch 2k monthly. It currently does not have a washer and dryer. I was thinking of buying a pair used to give the house an added amenity to help entice renters. Is this a good idea? or is it putting a burden on myself to be responsible for repairs, or is it no different from a dishwasher or fridge anyways.

thanks for reading 

Greetings Larry,

Adding a washer and dryer to your rental property can indeed be a good idea, especially when looking to attract potential renters. Many tenants see in-unit laundry facilities as a significant convenience and might be willing to pay a bit more for this amenity. This could help you reach your goal of $2,000 monthly.

However, it's important to consider a few things:

Cost vs. Benefit: Used appliances can save you money upfront, but ensure they are in good condition. Newer models might be more reliable and energy-efficient, which can be appealing to tenants and save on utility costs in the long term.

Maintenance Responsibilities: As a landlord, you'll be responsible for the maintenance and repair of any appliances you provide. This includes the washer and dryer. It's similar to providing a refrigerator or dishwasher. Make sure to factor in these potential costs and the time required for maintenance.

Insurance and Warranty: If you decide to purchase new appliances, they typically come with a warranty. For used appliances, you might consider an extended warranty or appliance insurance for peace of mind.

Rental Market Research: Look into what's common in your area. If most nearby rentals offer in-unit laundry, it could be a significant disadvantage not to provide the same. On the other hand, if it's a rare amenity in your area, it could make your property stand out.

Best of luck with your new investment!
KC

Post: How to structure lease for tenants with different lease lengths

KC Pake
Lender
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Orange Park, FL
  • Posts 169
  • Votes 106
Quote from @Eric Samuels:

So I have three prospective tenants for my property in Philly who are interested in renting but one only needs a 6-month lease and the other two are fine with an annual lease. I was thinking of signing all of them into an annual lease and adding an addendum allowing the one tenant to sublet with a person I approve of. There’s also the option of having them all sign two 6-month leases but then that does provide the chance they all leave after 6 months and my unit has been vacant for quite some time so I need to recuperate. Any specific concerns with subleasing or anything else? Other suggestions are appreciated

Hi Eric,

When considering leasing options for your Philadelphia property, you have a couple of choices. Allowing subleasing with your approval offers flexibility for the tenant needing a 6-month lease while maintaining stability for others, though it introduces the uncertainty of a subtenant's reliability. Alternatively, an annual lease with an early termination clause specific to the 6-month tenant could balance flexibility with security. Opting for two 6-month leases might increase turnover and vacancy risks. It's important to ensure that any agreement complies with local rental laws and is clearly communicated to your tenants. 

I'm sure other members will jump in with additional recommendations.

Best of luck,
KC

Post: 🤔Exploring the Benefits of Investing in Real Estate with Unsecured Term Loans

KC Pake
Lender
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Orange Park, FL
  • Posts 169
  • Votes 106
Quote from @Nicholas Pasowicz:

@KC Pake can you clarify unsecured since you compare vs a traditional mortgage. Do you consider private or HML unsecured or are you specifically talking about Personal Loans, Personal Lines, Credit Cards or Student Loans? I do Private Lending and wouldn't offer an unsecured loan. I always have a recorded lien with LTV

Hi Nicholas,

Great question - In the context of my comparison with traditional mortgages, when I refer to "unsecured" loans, I'm specifically talking about financial products like personal loans, personal lines of credit, and credit cards. These types of loans are typically not secured by any collateral, such as real estate or other assets.

Private lending and Hard Money Loans (HML), as you mentioned, usually involve some form of collateral, often with a recorded lien on the property, ensuring the lender's interest is protected. These loans are, by nature, secured loans due to this collateral requirement.

The key distinction here is that unsecured loans rely solely on the borrower's creditworthiness/income and do not have any collateral backing them. This difference impacts the risk profile of the loan, the interest rates, and the terms that lenders are willing to offer. While it's true that most private lenders, like yourself, prefer secured lending due to the reduced risk, unsecured loans can sometimes be a viable option for investors who may not want to tie up collateral and have strong credit profiles.

Thanks for adding to the conversation,
KC

Post: 🤔Exploring the Benefits of Investing in Real Estate with Unsecured Term Loans

KC Pake
Lender
Pro Member
Posted
  • Investor
  • Orange Park, FL
  • Posts 169
  • Votes 106
Quote from @Scott Jensen:

@KC Pake

Interesting. Are you bringing this up because you sell Unsecured Term Loans?

Regarding point 4, how would unsecured term loans lead to higher returns than a typical mortgage?

What are the fees, terms, and rates for these types of products?

@Scott Jensen  I appreciate your response to my post!

No, I wouldn't say that I sell unsecured term loans but we do offer them as part of a variety of funding products for investors.  This post is not meant to be a sales pitch.  I posted the topic as a financing option worth considering for real estate investors, especially those looking for alternatives to traditional mortgages, or HELOCs.  I have used the unsecured term loan option in several of my RE investments.

Regarding your question about point 4, unsecured term loans can potentially lead to higher returns compared to typical mortgages due to several factors:

Speed and Flexibility: Unsecured loans often have quicker approval and funding processes than secured loans like mortgages. This speed can be crucial in real estate investing opportunities.

No Collateral Requirement: Unlike mortgages, unsecured loans don't require property as collateral. This absence of a lien on the property can offer more flexibility in deal structuring, potentially leading to more profitable investment strategies.

Leverage: Unsecured loans can be used in conjunction with other financing methods, allowing for higher leverage in real estate deals. This can amplify returns, although it also increases risk.

As for the fees, terms, and rates for unsecured term loans, these can vary widely based on the lender, the borrower's creditworthiness, and market conditions. Generally, you can expect:

Interest Rates: Typically higher than secured loans due to the increased risk for the lender. Rates can vary significantly.  Generally, we see rates between 8% and 18%

Loan Terms: These can range from short-term (5 years) to medium-term (up to around 12 years), depending on the lender and the purpose of the loan.

Fees: Origination fees, and processing fees are common. The specifics depend on the lender.

Loan Amounts: Again, many factors drive this answer.  This loan product is often smaller than mortgages, reflecting the higher risk without collateral.  The lenders we work with normally offer between $50k and $300k.

I hope that helps answer your questions.

All the best,
KC