Quote from @Tony Pellettieri:
We have our 3rd Property under contract and plan to close in a week. The house is in a high appreciation area. Trying to figure out what the best exit strategy is. We are open to suggestions for different strategies than we're currently considering. We've been told seller financing may be a good option and we're open, just don't know how it would all play out, please advise.
We plan on paying cash for Acquisition & Repairs. This would be our first DSCR loan, and while I believe I have an idea of how it will all play out, looking forward to seeing the process.
Initial thoughts when putting property under contract were [repair, Rent, DSCR c/o, hold]. We will be taking possession with renters in place that are currently paying $750 a month. The plan is to wait to give them notice until day of closing, as requested by the seller. Rehab timeline less than 1 month after they vacate.
Now considering letting them stay, raising rent to $900/mo, completing minimal repairs as the house is currently in acceptable shape to them & good condition overall, DSCR c/o on a lower ARV. Will need to increase reserves going this route to account for future repairs. This will require less cash invested, shorter time frame to complete, and more cash we take from the deal.
Exit Strategy 1 - Have current Renters vacate, complete SOW, get new renters @ market rent, cash out on max ARV, HOLD.
ARV: 126,000
Acquisition: $60,251+ Closing $925
SOW Budget: $15,750
Rent after Rehab: $1,000
DSCR c/o $100,600 Loan @ 7.5% 30yr LTV80%: $840 PITI + Fees +/- $4000 (2pts+undw/orig/leg)
Cash Flow: $160 before Reserves
Cash Out - Cash In - Fees: $19,674 (100,600-60,251-925-15,750-4000)
Exit Strategy 2 - Have current Renters stay, complete light SOW, raise rent, cash out on lower ARV, HOLD.
ARV: 110,000
Acquisition: $60,251+ Closing $925
SOW Budget: $2,500
Increased Rent: $900
DSCR c/o $88,000 Loan @ 7.5% 30yr LTV80%: $752 PITI + Fees +/- $3800 (pts+undw/orig/leg)
Cash Flow: $148 before Reserves
Cash Out - Cash In - Fees: $20,524 (88,000-60,251-925-2,500-3800)
Hi Tony -
Congratulations on your third investment property! You have a lot going on here. Let's break things down, hopefully, I am understanding everything correctly...
Exit Strategy 1: Full Rehab and Rent Increase
Pros:Higher ARV (After Repair Value): This strategy could potentially increase the property's value to $126,000, allowing for a higher cash-out refinance amount.
Higher Rent: After the completion of the Scope of Work (SOW), the rent could be raised to $1,000, generating more monthly revenue.
Long-Term Value: Completing a full rehab could increase the property's long-term value and appeal, making it more competitive in the market.
Cons:Higher Initial Investment: The SOW budget is significantly higher at $15,750, requiring more cash upfront.
Vacancy Risk: Asking the current renters to vacate for the rehab introduces the risk of vacancy and lost rental income during the renovation period.
Longer Timeline: The rehab process and finding new tenants could extend the timeline before the property starts generating its anticipated cash flow.
Exit Strategy 2: Minimal Repairs and Keeping Current RentersPros:Lower Initial Investment: With a SOW budget of just $2,500, this strategy requires less cash upfront.
Quicker Turnaround: Completing minimal repairs and keeping the current tenants can significantly shorten the timeline to start generating cash flow.
Reduced Vacancy Risk: By allowing the current tenants to stay, the property continues to generate income, avoiding the risks associated with vacancy.
Cons:Lower ARV: This strategy results in a lower ARV of $110,000, which affects the cash-out refinance amount.
Lower Rent Increase: The rent increase to $900 is less than what could be achieved with a full rehab.
Future Repair Costs: Minimal repairs might not address all the property's needs, potentially leading to higher maintenance costs down the line.
Financial Analysis:Cash Flow Considerations: Both strategies provide positive cash flow before reserves, with Strategy 1 generating $160 and Strategy 2 generating $148 monthly. The difference is relatively minor, suggesting that the immediate cash flow impact of either strategy is not drastically different.
Cash Out - Cash In - Fees: Strategy 2 offers a slightly higher net cash after refinancing and expenses ($20,524) compared to Strategy 1 ($19,674). This suggests that Strategy 2 is slightly more efficient in terms of initial capital recovery.
Recommendations:Goal Alignment: Choose the strategy that best aligns with your long-term investment goals. If maximizing property value and securing higher rents is the priority, Strategy 1 might be preferable. If minimizing upfront costs and avoiding vacancy is more important, Strategy 2 could be the better choice.
Market Considerations: Research the rental market in the area. If there's a strong demand for high-quality rentals, investing in a full rehab could position the property more competitively.
Financial Flexibility: Consider your financial flexibility and risk tolerance. Strategy 1 requires more upfront investment and carries a higher risk of vacancy but offers higher potential returns. Strategy 2 is less risky in the short term but might require additional investment later.
Ultimately, the choice between these strategies should consider both the financial implications and the investor's personal objectives, including risk tolerance, investment horizon, and the importance of generating immediate versus long-term value.
Best of luck with your decisions - these are good options to have 😊
Have a great weekend,
KC