I don't quite agree with the negative cash flow scenario.
1) what happens if you can only put down 30% down payment on a house and you will see negative cash flow of several hundred dollars because expenses (mortgage, property tax, insurance, vacancy, property management fees, repairs) are several hundred dollars more than the actual rent?
Does this make it a bad deal? Not really. Because the tenant is paying your mortgage for you. Which is a lot better than you having that money in a checking / savings account which yields practically nothing.
SO even if you have negative cash flow, your mortgage is being paid and you are gaining equity on the house. WIthin 3-5 years, you could essentially be moving into positive cash flow, all the while gaining more equity in the process (and this is not your money and you are building wealth much greater than having that same original 30% down payment sitting in a bank all this time).
Also, if the house appreciates, more money to you.
So in summary, negative cash flow isn't bad if the house is in a great location, you screen the tenant properly so you suffer minimum damage to the property, rents are paid on time, and the house has a good chance of appreciating.
Thoughts and opinions???