All Forum Posts by: David Dachtera

There is no "lost" rent. The only numbers which can be considered "lost" are the late fees you didn't impose because the incentive convinced the tenants to pay early / on-time.

The "Added infrastructure and expenses" are the staff's (or your) time to handle the eviction filings and any related legal / court / etc. fees associated with that activity.

It also provides a "work-around" (where permitted) in those jurisdictions where late fees are limited to lower amounts.

$100 is the real number. I can put you in touch with my former landlord (he's not a denizen of BP), if you think that would help.

It's written in the lease that the rent is - using your example - $1,500 and that you get a $100 discount for paying on or before the due date.

Here's the logic: late fees, etc. require infrastructure and expenses. Also, if you have to take a tenant to court, the judge will award you back rent, but not late fees.

;-) 

Time to let it go and move on.

The seller's issues aren't your problem. Walk away.

So, it sounds like the only complaint you have about her is the late rent.

First guess time says her income is dependent upon factors she cannot control - tips and other gratuities, sales commissions, etc., none of which are dependable or guaranteed. She may also have variable expenses beyond her control.

Want your property destroyed? Give her a hard time about it. 

Don't want your property destroyed? Patience, compassion and accommodation are in order.

In fact, here's an idea ...

Move her due date from the first to 15th, but find a way to let her think it's still the first. That way, when she pays "late", she's still on time.

You could even combine that with a strategy my former landlord (property manager, really) used to employ: The lease shows that the rent is $xxx, but if paid before the due date there's a $100 discount (incentive = positive motivation; late fees are negative motivation and are less effective).

Another poster suggested you might not be landlord material, and I'm inclined to agree. If she's late, but has not missed a month, you're needlessly getting your own guts in a knot while increasing your efforts and expenses. It's to your own advantage to relax about it and accept the situation as it is. A class in landlording might be helpful to those who get hung up on punctuality to the point of considering legal action (eviction(= increased expenses)).

My $0.02 ...

How quick can you get an estimate on new cabinets?

Show that number to the prospective tenant and ask if they would be willing to negotiate to fund the update ... +$XXX dollars on the rent to cover the cost, then reduce the rent back to market once the update is paid off.

... and, of course, increase the rent based on the update (forced equity).

... or, leave the cabinets as-is and rent the unit at the advertised rate.

My $0.02 ...

Attorneys are not title companies, and vice-versa.

Close with a title company to help ensure all the bases are covered.

Have an attorney review and verify all closing documents and provide other advice.

Before you take short cuts to try and "save" money, ask yourself: "How much money can I AFFORD to 'save'?"

My $0.02 ...

"...a less than perfect deal"?

Something I often post to other social media sites: "'Perfection' is a fictitious town in Nevada from the 'Tremors' movies. Stop looking for it." There's even a Facebook group called "Done is better than perfect".

Something else I've posted to these forums multiple times: "The School of Hard Knocks is THE most expensive education out there." BP podcasters and other hosts have posted about much money they lost on their early deals through ignorance and inexperience. Some of them could have paid for their education 5 times or more just with their early losses.

"Over thinking" (I call it "insight") can help you find potential problems and pitfalls, even ones you've not encountered before. It only holds you back when you get stuck there.

My $0.02 ...

Hhhmmm... Well, first guess time, the worst of his behavior is likely to occur when he's intoxicated. Maybe get law enforcement involved as well as consult your attorney for actions you can take.

Shaming him out could backfire and result in damage to the property. Not sure I'd recommend such actions. He sounds like the kind who transmutes shame into blame - it's not his fault for f---ing up, it's your fault for calling him on it and that never turns out well.

Your attorney should be able to help you. You'll be signing legally binding contracts at closing; so, you should be using an attorney whether you have a buyer's agent or not.

My $0.02 ...

Child support? Why is that a lien against the property instead of a judgement against the owner of record if they are the delinquent parent? ... or is that just a CA thing?