I find it interesting that people chiming in from the West coast have more to say about the validity of the source (I don't have an opinion on that, but I'm distrustful of the NYT - I wonder if these same people would be content if they were the source) and veiled accusations of rasicm.
What I'm getting at is that the only two people that feel there may be something to the article both live in the area. Personally, I have a lot of knowledge about crime issues in the area, and many locals have for years been associating section 8 with spikes in local crime. There are numerous valid studies that bear this out, but there is more to section 8 than just that.
Section 8 is a real way to desegregate inner cities and give people an incredible chance at removing generational poverty from their family histories.
This could have led to an interesting discussion on the merits of section 8 to counter the naysayers, but it quickly went to finger pointing and dirty looks.
I'll leave this anecdote here: I live in one of the Dallas suburbs where people still sometimes leave doors unlocked without a second thought. About a year ago there was a murder of a lone female convenience store clerk. The suspect turned out to be from a similar adjacent suburb, but he got there by way of section 8 from a grittier part if town. He wasn't the one receiving the section 8 voucher, but he was part of the family that tagged along.
I see examples like this on an almost daily basis (minus the murder, but plenty of aggravated robberies), so when you live a thousand miles away, don't be so quick to cast your back handed political opinions on the problems we're experiencing. I do welcome reasoned opinions, or at least less inflammatory tones. I welcome any PM's on the matter, but I don't think I'll add much else to this discussion on here, unless the tack of the conversation changes.
Thank-you.