I invested in a property in property in San Diego in 2015, whose numbers were indicating it was going to be cashflow negative by a couple hundred dollars per month. I was a little surprised at the near universal advice I received which was along the lines of "never, never, invest in cashflow negative properties." Whenever I hear the term "always" or "never" as a rule, I become suspect. I bought anyway. As I just sold it, I wanted to post the stats here to get people's opinions.
Purchase year: 2015
Purchase Price, etc: $585k, 0% down (va), 30 yr fixed at 3.825%
Cashflow negative amount per month: $300-400, but let's call it $400.
Total cashflow negative when I went to sell in 2021: $31,200 ($4,800/year x 6.5 years of ownership)
Sale year: 2021
Total left on loan when it sold: $480k
Sale Price: $1,006,000
Gross gain: $526,000
Net gain: $465,000
So, it would have been smarter to forego this acquisition and the net gain in order to save $31,200? Or did I miss something.
While I agree that generally cash flow negative properties should be avoided, be careful when people advise you in absolutes.