As much as equity sharing is profitable for you, it is also a way to show your clients “Hey I am here for your success as much as you are, and I have a personal investment in you” which is an incredibly inspiring model.I would however say maybe scale your equity based on the current state profit margin of your client, or even work in a sliding scale so it doesn’t turn off potential clients who may be at a slim profit margin as is and are concerned about it getting any slimmer.

Why they wanna do this because it's the way for them to offer you IRR 15% just like before (although chance is way slimmer).

The difference between long term rents and mid term rents are slimmer here than in other markets because long term rents are so high.

New construction in appreciating areas offers long-term value growth, minimal repairs, and potential tax benefits, but often comes with higher purchase prices and slimmer initial cash flow.

Ashcroft can offer slimmer returns and still have excess demand for their offerings because of... brand.

Than, when an organization devises how-to and does it via pooled funds to operate at slimmer margins so they DO add rental inventory, next everybody howling gotta shut em down because now they can't buy homes at price they want......... 

I think those that bought in the last few years for appreciation or with adjustable rate mortgages and had slimmer cash flow/margins are feeling the pinch a bit more.

We build houses for $75-$85 per square foot which is our cost to build and we sell that for $150-$200 per square foot, sometimes our margins are much slimmer depending on the finishes of course.

For instance, many investors in Los Angeles go by 0.80 or even 0.90 as margins tend to be slimmer.

Buyers are slower to pull the trigger, investors are seeing slimmer margins.