If you buy upscale (desirable) properties in desirable areas as opposed to affordable (undesirable) crapboxes in undesirable areas you won’t need to entice tenants.

@Kristin Jarman I'm sure this is meant to sound enticing especially with the payments being "guaranteed" and tone online is hard so hopefully this doesn't come off too crass or anything but...Might just be me, but the idea of taking over another contractors failed or half done project, regardless of payments being "guaranteed" or not doesn't sound like an enticing project to me. 

In order to entice me to invest in spite of my hesitation, a better ROI must be offered to me.

At the end of the day, it’s a big decision choosing who to invest with, but the academy is very enticing.  

People that get destroyed are ones that are enticed by the low interest rate and assume they can refi after the second year. 

Your approach to asset protection and tax codes is impressive—I’m sure it will give you a solid foundation as you move forward with your investments.I completely agree with you on the U.S. market being a bit more affordable than in Canada, and the opportunities with Section 8 housing are definitely enticing for ensuring stable cash flow.

Once the funds are up and they can't repay the loan(s) back because offering free services are just enticing new investors that do not have a real system setup.

The guarantee of getting paid and a high hourly rate would be what would entice them to use the hourly rate structure over a commission structure.  

Make sure photos are enticing and due the property justice.

It could entice you to buy when you are not financially ready to buy.