It comes down to ratios.Basically, better properties cost more to buy and produce fewer dollars of profit per dollar invested vs. less good properties.  

I'm sure many top producing Agents, Teams and Brokers have had deals fall through in the last 30-45 days. 

San Diego is not yet great over that span, but it produced better cash flow than many of the "good" cash flow markets. 

I have been furloughed from my job, will it be difficult for me to get financed on an income producing apartment complex?

Wide-spread anti-body testing and solid proof that people with the anti-bodies can't be re-infected.I could be wrong, but I live at the epicenter of a city that I firmly believe is about to be crushed by this crisis, no matter what the governor, mayor or president do. 

I agree with the general sentiment above that considering the interest rate and your position, it is likely more advantageous in the long-term to invest it in an income producing asset. 

The universities who rely on football for the tremendous revenue it produces will be in trouble.  

WFC price (or equivalent dividend producer) is $28.38 a share, down from over $50 pre crisis. 

If I have two identical properties in all respects that produce the same NOI, but one is on the "good" side of the track and the other the "bad", the property on the good side of the tracks will sell for a lower cap rate, since people will pay more for that less risky stream of cash flows. 

We knew it would not be an income producing property, but my wife liked it very much and we are considering it for use as a residence when we are ready to downsize that significantly.