I have been examined by the department of corporations and securities in my state and have had them bless my RE paper offerings and have posted this on BP..Each state is different no doubt, but I am compliant in the states I work in.Although one hat does not fit all for sure and each investor should check their state corporate securities OR in the case of California the department of Real estate and decide if they are compliant in what they wish to do.The real issue is how the safe act is interpreted in each state..

If my interpretation is correct, the yield curve were flattened the last two times the stock market peaked and steepened as we get into a recession.

I hear you.My interpretation was that each tenant would pay for the lighting in front of their own unit, but after I've calmed down a bit, I can see how it may be seen as a common area.

Similar to many laws and regulations, this one in particular might just take the cake on ambiguities and interpretations.

I'm curious how the courts have interpreted this when it comes to insurance and dog breeds.No legal advice.

Customary carries more weight in enforcing any agreement than imagination.But, that's what gets attention and ultimately turned into some product, showing something new, different, profitable, unusual or that little know secret method presented with a skewed interpretation of reality or accepted thinking. :)

Once anyone "interprets" it then it loses all the value.

Your interpretation of the contract may not be what it legally means, see an attorney.

The government doesn't want to be tasked with providing for people that were unable to screen things properly and thus has this bar set up.The rules were changed with The JOBS Act a few years ago and the SEC finally issued their interpretation of things late last year.

Add on top of that the actual purchase of the home and monthly lot fees, and your profits disappear.Maybe i'm missing or interpreting these numbers incorrectly, but this is how I see it.George