Hello Bigger Pockets Community,I was just wondering since LA is such an expensive market, what would be the pros and cons of paying a higher down in a well appreciating area to stay afloat with positive cash flow in places like Los Angeles.For example, my biggest struggle right now is finding a property in the greater Los Angeles area that will provide cash flow but at the same time not fall behind on appreciation in comparison to major urban areas like Koreatown or Downtown LA. 

Your mailing should consist of a series of letters in sequence, over time.Set aside nixies (returned mail) and learn how to skip trace those target people. 

I see those being sold dark for comparison and they are worth maybe 30 to 50% of their purchase value.

At all times you are in control of what data you use to come up with the valuation, and it is just a tool for you to perform a sales comparison analysis.

Loopnet is exactly what I was looking for as this is our first lease and we're looking for comparisons in the area.

In comparison to the market mine are the smallest, but the second least expensive, so slightly higher priced (b/c they are all newly renovated).  

That was a great comparison.  

But yes, you can make a killing (knowing what I know now) there in low-cost, decent neighborhoods that will return high yield on rents.There is still a ton of buildable land there (LA is bursting at the seams in comparison), I would look towards the outskirts.

Because they only cator to investors the New Western model is truly backwards by comparison to traditional real estate.

The price seems high in comparison to the income.