Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

112
Posts
34
Votes
Geo Tan
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Los Angeles, CA
34
Votes |
112
Posts

Higher Down For More Cash Flow?

Geo Tan
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

Hello Bigger Pockets Community,

I was just wondering since LA is such an expensive market, what would be the pros and cons of paying a higher down in a well appreciating area to stay afloat with positive cash flow in places like Los Angeles.

For example, my biggest struggle right now is finding a property in the greater Los Angeles area that will provide cash flow but at the same time not fall behind on appreciation in comparison to major urban areas like Koreatown or Downtown LA. 

I know that it is important to use OPM to gain max returns on the investments but there is no way I can pay close to a thousand out of my own pocket per month to make the money back and then some with appreciation. So what if I paid 40% or 50% down on a property to allow positive cash flow while reaping in the benefits of appreciation as well. Besides greater risk by using more of your own money than loans, what downsides are there to doing this as my initial investment to start my portfolio?

Once again I apologize if this is a horrible idea or if I'm ignoring some basics in real estate investing.

Thanks in advance!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

476
Posts
197
Votes
Kevin Harrison
  • Investor
  • Woodbridge, VA
197
Votes |
476
Posts
Kevin Harrison
  • Investor
  • Woodbridge, VA
Replied
Originally posted by @Jacob Sampson:

Not all stocks are worth buying and not all areas are worth investing in.

While this may be true in many ways, I think what the OP wants to do does not fall into this advice. If OP wants to invest in LA then I don't see a problem with that. The reason we say don't go for the big down payment to make something work is because too many people want to force the numbers when they start in RE. LA is one of those places where you either have to "force the numbers" so to speak or you have to find another market. It doesn't sound like OP wants to find another market.

This strategy may not make sense for everyone or provide the highest COC returns, but it doesn't mean it doesn't work at all. It also sounds like the OP is trying to pick up some of the infamous CA appreciation which might just make better returns in the end with less CF. Just my 2 cents.

Loading replies...