data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c4c8/4c4c821683b981fe196b869cd82121701e7bd039" alt=""
29 June 2021 | 7 replies
Technically you are not approved.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70b32/70b32d685eaf2e7322d14d411ddb6217969b0aa1" alt=""
28 June 2021 | 5 replies
Yes, you could technically go after them for a violation, but is it really that important?
28 June 2021 | 9 replies
Please offer advice on the belowLease is from September 2020 - September 2022We are exploring two options:1.Eviction Proceed with an eviction or in lieu of eviction provide a new lease that captures both pet information but changes the lease end date to September 2021, because they are in violation we should technically evict them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b0d2/7b0d238c988be50ffd0493e32301491b60d76c9f" alt=""
10 July 2021 | 11 replies
That being said a wholesaler advertises an assignable interest and not the property so technically its not concerned by the 475.43.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f32ff/f32ff735482466347e2fe854d8dbf8114464ed3c" alt=""
29 June 2021 | 6 replies
Go ahead and sent it vs. getting caught in a technicality.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d2d5/3d2d58d166e0db770a67e24aee37574ebe5dd18c" alt=""
29 June 2021 | 4 replies
Figure out what you did with those 3 properties and you’ll have a more technical explanation of what “feels right” looks like.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23f79/23f79194d408bb243d3a109a273a38d5ae08eb08" alt=""
1 July 2021 | 4 replies
It seems like a strange technicality to me especially since there’s more potential liability because of the age and square footage on the current property I own.
5 July 2021 | 23 replies
The eviction moratorium technically only applies to people with hardship, but the burden of proof is on you.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74cf8/74cf85d75d971fb295bd1c0f4006cfe10a92281d" alt=""
2 July 2021 | 8 replies
It is technically true that the Court isn't striking it down the CDC moratorium but that's likely because it's about to end anyway.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec758/ec758937a452f7a7ef061bf6db7b038d62392fbc" alt=""
2 July 2021 | 8 replies
You will have a higher payment, so technically are you making 12% APR on that amount or are you making 12% minus the increase in rate payment.Option Two, you open a HELOC and have a revolving line of credit to invest or use as you see fit.