
18 February 2019 | 111 replies
And here are the lists you can target when you mail...again PM with email address if you need something formatted better:LISTS Primary Lists Equity owner i.30-100% equityii.owned 4 years or longeriii.SFR1.no apts, condos, land, MH, MF, etciv.1-3 bedrooms1.this is where they buyers buysv.Home values that are less than the median sales price in areavi.Exclude corps and trusts1.harder to deal with2.more sophisticated3.won’t get as good as deal typicallyvii.Absentee owner1.out of state – 1st best2.in state, but out of city – 2nd best3.in city – 4th4.everybody markets to them5.1st call pretty fastviii.Owner occupied1.65 years or older – 3rda.owned for 15 years or longeri.most likely deferred maintenanceb.do not use home as a retirement vehiclei.will want to be movingii.kids have moved outiii.neighborhoods have changediv.need a care facility2.everybody else – 5th3.not getting bombarded4.1st call a little slower because they don’t’ get touched as much Market for 90 days, every 3 weeks if you can i.Shorter than 3 weeks is too fastii.More than 6 weeks is too long You absolutely must have bought a house after getting 90 calls i.If not, your list must be faulty Sub-lists Obituary notice i.Not a probateii.Not inheritediii.Might be a trust Probates i.Has to have real estate attached Inherited i.Didn’t go through probateii.More than likely a quick claim deed, special warranty deed Unlawful detainers(evictions) i.Court action by landlord against tenant Divorcees i.Has to have property involved Pre-foreclosures i.Period of time that lender has lender has to change ownership of propertyii.Lis pendensiii.notice of default1.judicial or non-judicialiv.most don’t market to trustees because it happens so fast Mortgage lates i.30, 60, 90, 120ii.behind but not in foreclosureiii.30 days is too short to market too…could get caught up on paymentiv.60, 90 days is better to market to Expired listings i.Setup as a hot list FSBO/FRBO i.Put in yard or websitesii.Call the phone number on signiii.Send mail if you are getting a subscribed listiv.This is a hot callv.Set appointments to buy, not sell1.it is important that all the decision makers are there when I come to buy your house.
21 July 2015 | 7 replies
No felonies, evictions or unlawful detainers.
10 April 2023 | 11 replies
My name is Rick Stewart and if you contact me via social media (this website does not allow email or phone number), I can give you court documents and my attorney's information to verify that after THREE MONTHS of receiving zero rent, we had to forcefully evict (unlawful detainer) the tenant that Mario/Bridgehouse screened and moved in.
20 March 2017 | 8 replies
Here in Arkansas, you would probably have to use the unlawful detainer process to evict the occupants of your newly acquired property.

20 April 2012 | 4 replies
You then may want to cross check the addresses against unlawful detainer actions and see if there's a property with tenant issues.

11 April 2012 | 7 replies
Hello Andrew.Unlawful detainers we don't have.

17 November 2020 | 33 replies
Check out unlawful detainers at your court house...

12 April 2018 | 1 reply
Yes we all love our favorite place however the more people you know who know you buy houses the better.Visit the unlawful detainer hearings and speak to landlords doing pro per evictions.

2 September 2022 | 60 replies
State laws set unlawful detainer laws but policy is dictated at the very local level.

23 April 2020 | 20 replies
Read CAA's letter opposing AB 828 here.This bill denies equal justice to housing providers by:Forcing landlords to reduce rents by 25% even if a tenant cannot demonstrate a hardship or need.Allowing judges and the court system to set rents and change the rental agreements already in place.Assuming every tenant is facing a hardship related to COVID-19 and must be compensated for this hardship.Protecting nuisance tenants as it does not require tenants to answer an unlawful detainer complaintMandating that rental property owners demonstrate an economic hardship to collect the contracted rent.AB 828 is an unfair attempt to allow the government and the courts to give reduced rent to all tenants even if they have face no economic hardship, and it provides safeguards for landlords.Contact your state legislator and ask him or her to VOTE NO on AB 828.It's insane.