I'm looking to acquire one or two multi units and am interested mainly in positive cashflow.  

In the end I don't think the added benefit of the additional shear way justifies $20k additional dollars.

Its main activity is the insuring of residential mortgage loans made by private lenders.

ThanksThe truth about it is that there are 2 out of 3  beneficiaries that would NOT want me to benefit in any way, especially any monetary gain.

No company is paying for my insurance or benefits and all those costs unlike many ppl who sit at some companies desk gets paid for even if it’s not in your check!

Main in Southington, right across from the Y. 

Main reason he reached out to me to sell the property was because HomeUnion was exiting the property management business.

My main strategy so far has been BRRRR and like many people I have been the cog that makes the machine turn.

Although I understand many of the points about "he may be completely safe and a good tenant", the bottom line for me is that at the end of the day, I don't want people like this associated with my life in any way shape or form..... don't need the anxiety or stress....If someone else wants to be the saint and help this guy out, then that's your choice and more power to you..... for people like this, that just isn't me....I don't want to have anything to do with you.... not on a personal or professional level.... you can be someone else's problemIts one thing to have a criminal record and throw them some sympathy and help them out....for me its a whole other deal to give someone the benefit of the doubt and help them out when they are a repeat child sex offender.

I've been exploring the discussions addressing IRC 199A and the IRC 162 requirement that must be met in order to obtain the new tax benefit under 199A.