I could say lots of nasty things for you to do but when it comes down to it, the scum will win and you will loose.

Here is a link to the NY Times ~ March 6 1933:http://www.knology.net/~bilrum/gold_hoarders_nytimes_1933.jpgThe headline states: "Roosevelt Orders 4 Day Bank Holiday, Puts Embargo on Gold, Calls Congress"Coincidentally (or perhaps not), on the same day the front page also has this: "Hitler Bloc Wins a Reich Majority; Rules in Prussia"The difference, however, between today and the US back then is that they were on the gold standard.

That's like trying to win the lottery.

I was trying to place the earnest money check with escrow, and then have it remain un-cashed until my contingencies were removed.I got opinions from three different attorneys because I wanted to be able to sue for specific performance if a seller backed out of a contract.Each said my chances of winning a suit for specific performance where basically zero without cash consideration.

My favs I read this year"Influence" by Robert Cialdini "Winning Through Intimidation" - dont remember the author but a good bookI need to read more though.

Liberals don't care for Libertarians because they can get all that with their candidates plus the increasing government intrusion they love.Libertarianism is a general ideal of both parties, but expressed in different way, which is why it wins so few elections.

If I can help them by telling them how I did it, and how they can too, and make a few bucks for my time it seems like we both win.

If they win, i give em the house.

Looks like you also take into consideration their needs making it a win-win situation.

What is it that would separate the winning offer from all the others?