data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efdad/efdadf2fc0b12de0e17705d4cb28c350a115e8b2" alt=""
22 May 2019 | 7 replies
I imagine that this will affect determination as to whether this is a good deal or not.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5475/d5475fda0e14a0921161ec90ad853070af30ef76" alt=""
7 June 2019 | 18 replies
Young guys willing to make the sacrifice to house-hack, but are having a hard time getting the GF on board because that beat up duplex in a C class neighborhood is not what she had in mind when she imagined her first house lol.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9850a/9850aa23207eb63ceda0436bbfae259cb7b454ca" alt=""
27 May 2019 | 32 replies
., @Michael Ealy, @Preston Quinn, to illustrate my point imagine two potential investments: Both will rent for $1500/month. #1 is bought at FMV for $150k (hitting the 1% rule),#2 is BRRRRed for an ARV of $200k, refi is for $150k (meeting your 1% rule)Expenses are the same:$150: Management (10%)$120: Vacancy (8%)$112: Repairs (7.5%)$112: CapEx (7.5%)$150: Property Taxes$75: InsuranceAssume utilities are billed to tenants=$719 Total ExpensesCashflow for #1: $177/month$1500 GSR - $719 Expenses - $604 Debt Service (5%, 30-yr, 25% down)Cashflow for #2: ($24)/month, that's negative$1500 GSR-$719 Expenses-$805 Debt Service (5%, 30-yr, 25% equity left in deal)Of course, you have $50k of equity in #2, which is awesome, but the 1% rule is used to determine if a property will likely cash flow as a buy-and-hold rental.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09aac/09aacba8ccaa7f8a98448ffb99240b87dcd3e638" alt=""
13 May 2019 | 13 replies
I imagine you trade the (relative) ease of the process for a smaller cash flow correct?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a23be/a23be78d14c21ad11edcb068416e2e8806c9f08a" alt=""
8 May 2019 | 6 replies
As a landlord, if you receive knowledge that there are additional occupants not listed in the lease agreement, your lease should state the consequences - typically increased rent and/or eviction due to breach of lease.I can imagine, especially in Los Angeles, where someone might think it's a good idea to state maximum occupancy as soon as possible, but I would be hesitant because, again, there is no fixed rule.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f5dc/2f5dc6b78444c58f6e31eec2f138203109ba68af" alt=""
8 May 2019 | 5 replies
Back in the day when foreclosures were popping like corn, I was very successful but now I would imagine it would be harder because the lender can get full or close to full value for their asset.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df7f8/df7f8775b8167ea93e13ab85983ac4be5a47deeb" alt=""
9 May 2019 | 20 replies
Whether that is actually true or not or just a misconception and lack of imagination on the companies side...who knows.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab9a6/ab9a6dc38565763f366e075f33917719cccb854e" alt=""
11 May 2019 | 45 replies
I would imagine most "wholesalers" are lured in by the idea of getting into real estate with 0 money, no credit, etc.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ba55/2ba5597a7aa1bf76d182675b3038960c10183b6d" alt=""
13 May 2019 | 4 replies
Imagine how nice a complex becomes if many of the owners have moved and are dying to sell but cannot.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8fe0/f8fe000b5e49a5097c7fe1d23b1de33febc55641" alt=""
10 May 2019 | 2 replies
I’d imagine renting by the room adds more work for you.