data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fcbff/fcbff9f88bec68536f5a04a7ec10ce5519389f7c" alt=""
18 January 2025 | 3 replies
Lots of investors simply want to go "bold" on all of their projects by using sharp color contrasts, busy tiles that catch your attention, and modern lighting that looks like it belongs in a hotel.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86332/8633294439dfb7031eb16734ffcc002fb875967f" alt=""
31 January 2025 | 24 replies
And then, there is the true catch-22 with gurus, which is: the people that I would want to teach me are very likely too busy and too successful in real estate to be spending time educating competitors.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23103/2310310a9c6449750c970c5b397ea66e312b9897" alt=""
25 January 2025 | 12 replies
Even with Section 8 inspections (if you’re in that space), you’ll find that they don’t catch everything.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e566/0e56656eb93ac4b2fd967668afcabcfbb3ae89ac" alt=""
13 January 2025 | 2 replies
On the surface, the deal seems appealing, but there's a catch: the asking price is $475,000, which is about 18% over the market value (based on comps and DealCheck estimates around $402,000).Details of the DealProperty: Duplex, 2,400 sq. ft., Purchase Price: $475,000 ($197.9/sq. ft.).Estimated Market Value: $402,000 ($168/sq. ft.).Financing Terms: 2% interest rate, with a 9-year balloon.Unit B Income: $2,049/month (Section 8 tenant through November 2025).Unit A Income Potential: Similar rent or higher; Section 8 cap for the area is $3,234/month.Monthly Loan Payment (P+I): $1,386.Cash Flow Breakdown (if both units are rented at $2,049/month):Gross Rent: $4,098/month.Vacancy (10%): $410/month.Operating Expenses (37.3%): $1,376/month.Net Cash Flow: $943/month.Key QuestionsWould you be comfortable paying an 18% premium for financing at 2%, especially in a market where current mortgage rates are closer to 7%?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e29ab/e29abd69d372ee0357e86f1d785349570796b6d1" alt=""
17 January 2025 | 3 replies
I shouldn't be catching these things...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2349/c23495629891b11c24c395328d57e862813f8f3d" alt=""
17 February 2025 | 92 replies
In MN if you try to get a rental license and your nowhere to be found on record of ownership and there is a different owner on record, there gonna catch n flag that requiring the "actual" property owner has to complete all licensing requirements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d5d0/9d5d018a19a7d5063c9aa53ab6fa0a1dff9c2ea8" alt=""
27 January 2025 | 17 replies
Im assuming that is what would catch any errors in owner distributions, deposits, profit/loss?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71a6f/71a6f66bffa6c16efd6c73ec532cd8c0ee585459" alt=""
22 January 2025 | 12 replies
It seems like there is no catch, would they let me buy a property this month and a property the next month for instance if I have the 25% down+closing costs and can prove that it rents for a decent amount more than the mortgage?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b4b8/5b4b8bf798a9b06d8227e2292bffb1423795a776" alt=""
31 January 2025 | 44 replies
The catch is I bought in Dec 21, put renters in in Jun 22 and didn’t try to mortgage it until Nov 24.