data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/361c4/361c401c5df2c0ff3de19559b72056300c9776f7" alt=""
20 May 2016 | 6 replies
If you did not serve notice, it is possible your tenant may be legitimately staying on.If you did serve notice, or there is no automatic transition to a monthly tenancy in Minnesota, then check your tenancy laws to see how "over-holding" is to be addressed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1be2/c1be282ee45b7a44b0221282aba3908d6ce75c85" alt=""
11 May 2016 | 25 replies
The point is, there are legitimate reasons communities need to find solutions for affordable housing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e32b/5e32b98b1c3d0d96f20ba1b54434d36c9bad8573" alt=""
6 May 2016 | 10 replies
There are plenty of legitimate actions on the part of a landlord that can drive out a tenant.
1 May 2016 | 7 replies
Hi all,After doing some research, I think that I'm comfortable with the requirements of how to handle abandoned property or items that tenants leave behind after an eviction or left-the-city-overnight escapes...but I'm not as clear on what to do if tenants leave behind something after a legitimate lease move-out and ending.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb5ab/fb5ab93402aad7915736e3b0c0cf62c9577218e9" alt=""
1 May 2016 | 18 replies
Every time we call, we get a different story about what they require to verify that WE are a legitimate landlord.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26ea3/26ea351ac8b4cb8b38b38063b214cf209ac32efb" alt=""
27 April 2016 | 6 replies
Looking for a legitimate property owner or a property manager that works that area.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83c90/83c90af20fe61e984b8c7f87f84f413a1f2b86c2" alt=""
27 April 2016 | 22 replies
However I do fix these IF I find that the item legitimately broke and was not due to rough handling.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afc22/afc22bd3c41e455d0399cb8cd0316b3dffc7049a" alt=""
27 May 2015 | 29 replies
It sounds like you've researched this person well enough to know they are legitimate and they are sending you money not asking you for it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f7dc/3f7dc77d18d4cbad297a8b02960d3a0050790b6e" alt=""
28 November 2015 | 12 replies
Is the reason for wanting the fence legitimate?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f604/2f604302f5ee3afaeab00f54779f95898bc2c446" alt=""
26 May 2015 | 17 replies
Assuming the repairs were all legitimate, you won’t be responsible for repaying any of the $2,000, as that is the intent of a security deposit, but you’ll have to be able to provide proof that the funds were spend only on those repairs.