
9 April 2010 | 24 replies
Originally posted by "Mikey":After that I just looked under umbrella policys and if you have enough insurance you shuld be just fine.

2 April 2014 | 7 replies
That's also why you have liability coverage during that ownership period, which covers you during that insured term and forever as well as any current policy you may have.I'd talk to a RE attorney as to the assessment of any risk in reality, I've never heard of a homeowner being sued 10 years later for any of those issues.Can they prove that mold existed prior to or on the day of sale?

15 June 2014 | 21 replies
Attorney had to report to court what their were for assets, and he only named the house and the $25,000 policy.

16 September 2013 | 8 replies
But, you may ask, why not keep the ex-owner's policy in place?

19 September 2013 | 6 replies
I agree with @William Robison and my personal policy is always....disclose, disclose, disclose ; )Good luck!

3 November 2013 | 10 replies
If the market decides to make a U turn and go down from here, we won't see much of a drop in home prices.Regardless if this economic recovery is real or Fed policy driven, we can't argue with history.

24 October 2013 | 15 replies
You can probably get away without all that until a neighbor gets upset about noise/parking issue or there's a fire and you discover your policy won't cover you.

2 December 2014 | 53 replies
They checked out perfect and I changed my mind (policy?)

4 August 2014 | 16 replies
Create your policies on the front end based on criteria that you've learned through your research here and via books and courses (like Mike Cantu and "Fixer" Jay Decima) as well as Mr.

6 August 2014 | 3 replies
Most lenders have a rate match policy anyway so they don't lose potential clientele because a competitor offered an interest rate thats an 8th cheaper.