More attractive because it will be appealing to *SOME* SFR buyers who might occupy it and be able to derive additional income from it where a standard 3 or 4-plex would not.Less attractive because it will turn off many investors because they will want to standard building with identical units since it's less maintenance (under one roof).I am trying to debate whether I should stay with SFR or real MF, or consider some of these in-betweens?

. :)PS. no debate, don't need to hear excuses or justifications, or opinions to the contrary from the guilty or the greedy, that's pretty much the way it is folks.

I know this was an old post but i'm currently debating if I should go the auction route or stick with a realtor.

As we were debating the potential rent, location and HOA concerns, my wife said "Well, if the worst case scenario played out, we could always move in to this place and sell ours".

Rodney and I have debated the subject.

So I debated on renting the room out since I live close to a local college.

I do agree with the arguments for using a HELOC and I was just debating this very same thing for myself about 6 months ago.  

crazy isnt it...they're debating the same thing in Seattle (gee what a surprise given they elected a Socialist to the city counsel).  

However, I don't see how it is even debatable that the agent has to add value in excess of either his or her commission or 2X his or her commission in some cases.

I know that the repairs will not be completed by the amended contract date and i'm debating if it's worth the hassle of putting my life on hold another month or if I should just walk away and look at other avenues.