Investors should be extremely cautious with Qualified Intermediaries that also represent (and get paid on) replacement property solutions or Qualified Intermediaries that refer clients to their "associates" or "friends" for replacement property solutions so that they can get paid a referral fee or those that actively put replacement property solutions together in order to make money.  

To confirm my recommendation ask him for references at his current developments, I bet he won’t give you names and will make up an excuse!

If not, are there any other solutions you’d recommend?

Two potential solutions I have in my mind are:1.

That is how I've operated for years, well before the NAR fiasco and as agents, we have always been advised from referring to status quo, standard, typical, etc when it relates to commissions.It continues to amaze me how many buyers/investors believe the agent value is finding them "deals."

I don't have the room to add a Washer and Dryer, so I'm trying to come up with a solution that I can offer.

There are often creative solutions when you get others involved who have experience or resources.It sounds like you’re determined, and with some outside-the-box thinking, you’ll find a way to make this happen.

Midtown refers to a specific area and it's quite desirable. 1/1 MTRs would do well here IMO.

For reference, I expect a turnover to take me 4-6 weeks.

These methods include:Detailed Engineering Cost ApproachDetailed Engineering Cost Estimate ApproachSurvey or Letter ApproachResidual Estimation ApproachSampling or Modeling ApproachExperience or “Rule of Thumb” ApproachFor further details on the methodologies, refer here.WHAT ARE THE BEST AND WORST PROPERTIES FOR COST SEGREGATION STUDIES?