(If you're marketing as an individual)If you're marketing as a business you'd be better off with a "Thanks for calling ABC Home buyers you've reached us when we're on the other line or with a client.

But the income checks out.Not arguing, just trying to understand your logic.

Since this is a real estate site and not a healthcare site, I'll refrain from arguing for you to be a traveling nurse with real estate on the side.

@Richard Dale-MesarosGentlemen, in Massachusetts you're allowed to meter and charge Tenants for Water and Sewer use (if it's on the Lease of course) but it's such an easy (confuse-able) arguing point for Plaintiff Attorneys that most Landlords I know, don't bother.and according to a friend in the Mass Rental Housing Association even if you have one light on a Tenants service it's an automatic 3 months of electrical that you have to forgive.Is it working for you guys?

I'd argue that they over charge for that inconvenience, but it seems to be par for the course.Assuming the 8-property portfolio consists of scattered sites, that's $500 per building, which isn't unreasonable.

Yes, it can be done online but there are a few simple things that the attorney can choose [or not] that can make a big difference later.PM me if you would like the contact info of a local attorney that is active in our industry.I have my S-Corp as the "parent" and then several LLC's under that for different uses [flip, wholesale, hold, JV, etc]I've found over the years that I don't need the partnership as much as I thought as well.Finally, if you are going to do a partnership, I would recommend having very defined job descriptions for each partner [as in "The E-Myth] to help cut down on any confusion [arguments] later.Another good resource on this subject is Rich Dad Education "The ABC's of RE Investing".

Read as much as you can  I like Million Dollar RE agent by Gary Keller, Million dollar investor by Gary Keller, and The Abcs of Commercial Real Estate Investing by Ken McElroy.

With apartment complexes I would argue the building makes up more than 80% of the value, however. 

So I would argue that the integrity of mortgage was not violated (the collateral was still subjected to forced sale). 

By crafting a bill this incredibly vague with little to no explanation as to how or who will decide what costs are “necessary to maintain the dwelling unit” or “substantially likely to force a tenant household to move or involuntarily relocate”, you have guaranteed ample employment opportunities for attorneys to argue both for and against this.