I've bought commercial properties off of LoopnetIf you're an agent/broker selling a property wouldn't more exposure be better in general?

General consensus around here that I have seen is that:Buy and hold guys don't want the liability of a tenant getting sick or claiming to get sick from exposure to some area that missed treatment, or the soil in the yard if it has some unknown contamination.And flippers aren't willing to gamble that they got it waaay low enough to take the back end discount that they will need to likely take to get a end buyer to purchase.That is what I've seen pretty much every time this question has been posed in the past.

I have some limited exposure to the industry, but am currently looking to get involved in the form of a passive limited partner.

Slightly better exposure but even more expensive.  

Investors typically carry debt between 60-75% leaving a relatively small amount of exposure (equity).

we certainly have some low oil price exposure, and the state budget may face more cuts this year and near term, so short term it is hard to say..

You can hedge your exposure to a bad company by getting some recommendations from other investors.

Certainly, the bank would view it as a potential risk (after all, the financial exposure you have now will not be the same after you close on the first property).

You make your "deposit" AKA premium with NO market risk, NO tax exposure(when structured correctly).

You have to get title insurance anyway, and no title company is underwriting without doing their own searches, so you're not saving any money doing it yourself and your exposure is tremendous.