Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago,

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Bryan Johnson
  • Los Angeles, CA
0
Votes |
3
Posts

Question on Potential Real Estate Investment Partnership

Bryan Johnson
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

Hi All,

I've been reading for quite some time, but finally decided to make an account given my current situation.

I have been presented with a partnership opportunity for a real estate investment. For a bit of background on myself, I currently work in finance and have little experience within RE. I have some limited exposure to the industry, but am currently looking to get involved in the form of a passive limited partner. The person I would be working with currently works in the space and owns a number of units. He currently does a lot of contractor work and spends most of his time with his original portfolio.

In regards to structure, the initial equity contribution would match with the purchase price of the property. The one thing I am getting hung up on is that he is proposing to alter the equity mix by including his own contractor work into the value of the property. As an investor, I respect that he will spend more time rehabbing and renovating the property, but I don't know if I understand the concept of adding that work to the total value of the property. I feel like that is something that would be hard to track and a very arbitrary calculation that could significantly dilute my equity ownership in the property. I'm sure many people on the forum have run into similar situations, is this a standard clause or am I potentially getting hosed here.

The property does need some work and that is a key factor (it is being purchased at a significant discount and is not producing income) and the fact that my partner is a contractor already is a huge benefit (renovations done nearly at cost). As a result, I could understand throwing a higher portion of equity in that direction assuming we invested the same amount, but I'm not sure what the protocol is here. Should I be pushing for a 50/50 structure? I'd love to hear any and all advice, thanks in advance for the help!

Bryan

Loading replies...