This means they are not professional enough to care to improve what they do, and you run the risk of not getting the advantage of the latest information for investors - such as new laws, common practices, new technology, or professional education opportunities. 2) How are their online reviews?  

Their website basically shows they have all the same features as showmojo, so I'd guess I'd have been happy going with them as well.I'll also be trying out the self-show codeboxes that integrate with either platform - I know many PMs don't care for the idea of using these self show boxes, but I'm a sucker for technology and if they might provide a potential for shorter vacancies, and increased prospect and personal convenience, I'm willing to test them out.

You'll need to do more than one fund to justify the costs.As others have mentioned in different threads, the sponsors are typically using the technology to more efficiently process their existing investors and the new investors simply complement them.  

I find that people who are closed minded and negative about the program either tried it decades ago (before technology allowed some of the controls we have today to be in place) or they tried it on a small scale and were not proactive about protecting themselves when something went wrong.  

I was trained to be an architect at Wentworth Institute of Technology.

Think of new technologies, gadgets, software applications all causing all sorts of disruption in the space and all of which put a dent on in-store traffic count.

This is a new age and you need to step up to the new technology.

In my humble opinion, technology should be a landlord's/propery manager's best friend.  

The other triplex we purchased at $49,500 we are $16K into renovations its yields $2250/mo with a break even of $700/mo, we estimate another $30K will get the house in great condition(windows, account for $15K of that).The $130K property purchased in 2013 now values at $500KThe $49.5K property purchased in 2016 now values at $82KThese are all great comparables because of the cost of acquiring these properties in terms of cash to close are relatively close.In reality, the Toronto renters there quality is A-/B+ or on a scale of 0-100 prob an 88 (both families where the earners work in Engineering or Technology)The Detroit renters their quality ranges from 75-95 where the income earners are Trust Fund Babies(I consider the lowest grade), Medical Resident, Consultant at a Big 4 Accountant Firm, A Law Library Librarian, Marketing Professional, and Electrician.The high cashflow rentals fuel the ability to purchase the rentals in more "desirable" areas.

All that being said, carpet technology has improved vastly in the last 3 years and there are now stain proof carpets available.