Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

675
Posts
884
Votes
David Song
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Redwood City, CA
884
Votes |
675
Posts

Why to avoid < 50 k properties

David Song
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Redwood City, CA
Posted
If a house sells 50 k and rent for 1000, it meets 2% rule. But actually I think it is not necessarily a good investment. Assuming SFR, 1500 sf, 3 be 2 ba, in small Midwest town. Move on ready. 30 years old. No renovation. Why?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,335
Posts
4,243
Votes
Greg H.
  • Broker/Flipper
  • Austin, TX
4,243
Votes |
4,335
Posts
Greg H.
  • Broker/Flipper
  • Austin, TX
ModeratorReplied

Typical perception from the West Coasters that all Sub 50K properties are dumps in the ghetto.  My worst rental exceeds 2% and some exceed 5%

Purchased 2017 for less than $30K

22K Purchase in 2016

14K Purchase in 2016 on 3 acres rented for $850

I can go on and on.  Blanket statements just do not work in real estate investing

  • Greg H.
  • Loading replies...