There is actually a lawsuit in the PA supreme Court about it you can look up.

You as a private person can’t rent your private property to another private party at a price you both agree to Hopefully the supreme court take the NY case and either abolishes it requires the government to pay for the taking as required under the constitution.

The buyer agency thing is a non-issue for me, I always operated in a manner where I deliver supreme value that client's seek-out and are happy to pay for, knowing I take it as a personal mission to keep it ROI and deliver a negotiated deal that meets and exceeds that expectation.

although you dont want to let those systems get into a failure mode you would have a supreme problem.

There are currently 23 states (as of last count a couple of weeks ago) that enforce this law.I know this because we just locked up 2,500 SFR's in your state (in Orlando, to be specific) that are past the redemption period (bank did not pay delinquent HOA dues), and the same law group that won the case in Nevada in front of Supreme Court (see link below) is handling the conversion into Warranty Deeds.

For us we are supremely blessed with our new build project in Oregon it has been quite the adventure coming out of the ground right when covid started.. then lumber 3X etc etc but for us the values rose to keep our original or exceed our profit margins per pro forma just taken a little longer than what we all planned or hoped for.

Maybe I'm a supreme skeptic, but all these positive posts on Fund And Grow seem a bit fake.

Lawler, TX (2008), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/tx-supreme-court/1398705.h...Tex.

My Supreme Overlord Of The Known And Unknown Galaxies.MSOOTKAUG It's a funny!

its just everything else real estate related I bet 20% of so called investors buy 80% of the props.. the rest are dreamers or afraid to pull the trigger are supreme time wasters. and or the number crunchers who rely on some spread sheet to determine their returns etc etc.