Do you know for a fact that this sponsor discloses these money-losing deals in their general marketing and to new investors?

If the Grantor is refusing, the other option may be a declaratory judgment action which asks the court to declare the deed valid.If you elect to take the deal to another title company you may want to disclose to them the issue you're having. 

Depending on their level of certification / registration, they have a true fiduciary duty that they are required to disclose to you exactly how they are getting compensated - including if they are getting commissions on any of the products. 

Won't name names, but one owns a creative finance education platform, and the other is a well known creative finance podcast host (neither are Pace Morby).Both told me the same thing: Not disclosing the second position lien to your first position lender is mortgage fraud, regardless of how it's structuredThis method is certainly interesting, and may in fact be allowed by your lender if you disclose it, but it seems disclosure is the name of the game.

Turns out the structure is significantly older (1930's) than the main house - this was not disclosed - and it ended up needing more like $55k of work done.

I have significant equity, which I won't fully disclose, but I'm keen to network with individuals in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

The syndicators model is to use distinct entities for every transaction so they do not necessarily have to disclose losing transactions.

Some disclosed and many non-disclosed pets.  

Then disclose all of the inspections and the finding from the contractors.  

Obviously this should be disclosed to the servicer.