Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 8 months ago, 05/23/2024

User Stats

202
Posts
282
Votes
Sean Bramble
  • Investor
  • United States
282
Votes |
202
Posts

Anyone done a "Morby Method" deal? Zero down creative strategy

Sean Bramble
  • Investor
  • United States
Posted

Heard about this on Pace Morby's Youtube channel - it's a zero down creative strategy that works when 1) the seller is open to seller finance, but 2) needs a sizeable DP for various reasons (i.e., pay off their existing loan, closing costs, and/ or put some cash in their pocket, etc)

There are 2 "legs" of the transaction. My understanding is it works like this:

Example: purchase price = $1M, seller still owes $200K, seller also needs addl $150K cash at close for whatever reason. But the buyer wants the property at zero down.

First leg:

-- Buyer secures a loan (1st position) for $350K and sends to title company (this is the amount needed to pay off sellers loan + their required cash at close)

-- Buyer also sends $650K cash to the title company (can put in your own cash, or do a temp loan from a transactional lender)

-- First leg of txn is now complete, and the $1M stays at the title company (this is bc you customized escrow instructions upfront to instruct them how to disperse money before escrow began)

Second leg:

-- Buyer and Seller enter into an agreement through an LLC which allows them both to be on title, and seller agrees to seller finance the buyer $650K of the purchase price (on whatever terms they agreed on). Being on title protects the seller from the buyer defaulting - it seems this is an alternative to "officially" putting them in a 2nd position)

-- Title company sends seller the $350K they require

-- Title company sends buyer back $650K (which they can use to pay off their transactional lender if they used one)

So now the seller is happy bc they got the $350K they needed, the buyer is happy bc they acquired a property for zero dollars out-of-pocket, and from what I understand the 1st position lender is happy bc due the LLC arrangement the seller finance component is not technically considered a second lien on the property. Plus all parties were protected throughout the entire transaction through the title company.

Have any of you completed a deal w/ this method? Am I understanding this right? I would love to hear your thoughts on the pros/ cons/ risks involved

Loading replies...