As an example, think of the definition of "EBITDA" which is used very frequently in financial circles - there are thousands of ways & interpretations to calculate EBITDA.

I still wouldn't recommend it, and I'm not a lawyer, so take my interpretation as just that...my interpretation.

CA tends to take a broad interpretation of what constitutes doing business in the state. 

The IRS always wants to enforce the rules selectively and to interpret them in a manner that is optimal for them.

For the tax side of things, I'd like to nominate you, add @Basit Siddiqi, and second @Ashish Acharya and @Michael Plaks (even though Michael and I disagree on interpretation of the code and regs 95% of the time!)

Eric, i am realizing with my readings everyday that foreclosures are a dangerous business and one should be very careful.actually i have not tried calling the county or the bank, thanks for that advice Damon.thanks Peter for the site. actually that's what i have used so far, but it doesn't give me much info, or its probably as you say, that i may not be interpreting the info correctly.

Promoting sentencing guidelines for civil actions is beyond my competence, but some of your comments are inconsistent with my interpretation and experience regarding NC statutes.

@Manolo D. the way you structure your entities and what services are conducted are critical to how things get interpreted.

Maybe the texts were snarky or maybe you just interpreted them that way.

Someone thinks or interprets something that way and then it is quoted as fact....