I see that is completely unreasonable. 

On the other hand, the tenant probably would not want the repair person there without you.I don't think it's unreasonable to ask the tenant to find a time to be home for the repair person, although in your case, if the tenant balks, then you have to worry about pipes freezing and not just the tenant's convenience.

That’s unreasonable.  

The flip-side is that if you put 0% down, you really don't "own" the building and thus it would be unreasonable to expect any cash flow without having any equity.

I have checked the listing, and the list price is completely unreasonable.

Basically, if the average person would see this is unreasonable then it applies and appears to be your case.

Not ideal, but if you're only putting $10K down, it's not unreasonable to bring some additional cash to make closing work. 3.

I don't see this charge as unreasonable since these companies have overhead to pay for an do provide a nice service. 

Does anyone else think 8 days is an unreasonably short amount of time to fix code violations, even for something as simple as debris removal?

Would it be unreasonable to assume that you currently have a tenant with such a history and are looking for something on which to grasp?