You can live practically for free and receive investment income. 

@Melissa Rivera Not necessarily but lending to a corporation is standard practice.  

I've begun to analyze deals for practice and yesterday I found what looks like an incredible deal (maybe I'm just being ignorant though).  

Plus if there's any damage to the property, that would practically change your agreement.I don't think this will stop tourists from coming to Miami beach.

If your parking policy/practices are clearly posted on the lot, anyone who parks there is forewarned and your reputation will not be tarnished by simply following your posted practice.

Hi @Collin Schwartz I have 2 main goals at this time:1) Network with like minded investors in the Metro Area to share ideas and best practices with.2) Identify key partners where I can leverage some sweat equity for equity share right now and when my own capital is freed up, a partner that I can invest with and split the work.#1 is of highest priority to me, #2 will depend solely on the relationship that is built and the deal at hand.Thanks for the reply.

Each of their other lending practices still apply - i.e.

Larger government laws overrule smaller ones.Anyway, this page from the Ohio bar says you can put it in the tenant's name: https://www.ohiobar.org/forpublic/resources/lawfac...It's sounding like "keep the water in the owner's name" is common practice people think is actually required.Edit: I'm obviously not giving anyone legal advice, I'm just an accountant raised by lawyers, so I'm persnickety about this stuff.

I am practicing evaluating potential rentals, and refining my criteria.  

Since you would be withdrawing practically all the equity from your co-op, why don't you just sell it?