reglazing isn't a cure all.  

Adjustments to sales comparables are done on a "cost to cure" value (i.e. construction cost to repair or make like the other property).

They give a 90-day notice to cure.  

This gives them an idea of what to expect and also a chance to cure anything before move out. 

But learn from this experience, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

My firm does evictions and foreclosures, draft closing docs, cures defects in title, probates estates, and litigates issues related to real estate.

In all likelihood there are no more redemption rights and even a void tax sale has been cured with 3 years of adverse possession after the tax deed date.

Re: "Throwing money at problems"- At this specific case yes, but it is a problem that can be cured relatively easily and cheaply.

@Russell Brazil yes I have won one specific performance suit.. but vastly different set of circumstances.the seller was losing the property and needed 40k to cure the tax ( property tax) default or they were going to lose it .In Oregon its the only state I personally know were property lost for non payment of property tax's escheats to the state.. no public auction no overage no right of redemption other than the county commissioners can over turn it down the road.. that all said there was no time to do a formal escrow so I did a Purchase and sale contract.. gave the seller 5k of non refundable EM and handed it to her.. 

Raised rents, cured some different maintenance, installed professional management.