But, they don't like that answer, so they keep looking.Eventually, they stumble across someone who makes claims of great success, of secret techniques, of large checks flowing into their bank accounts, and offer to share that information for just the price of admission.

Again, this depends on whether that money is flowing into his pocket or is being wholly used to fund the site...and again, I don't have any indication one way or the other...No, his first motivation is greed and second, or perhpaps a very distant second, is for the collective good.Given that none of us can get inside of his mind, it's a bit circumstantial to assume what his motives are and in what priority.Again, is there any documentation you know of (or admission from Assange himself) about his profit from the site?

Rush's claim was in regards to Ms Jackson, not the EPA in general. even to her own admission, when she got there...May 1st: "Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa P.

Refer 5 people and gain free admission to the class.

My reasoning was that one deal could cost several times what the price of admission was if I ended up screwing things up!

By your own admission you left stuff behind.Did you do a walkthrough?

BY THEIR OWN ADMISSION!!!!

Admission was $97 for existing customers of our service.

I found contractors for REO's, aid in investing out of state, help with my college admission to UF, and even a partnership to apply my internet marketing skills to market an e-book.

I would be more than willing to pay the HOA $516, but my I’m afraid that by paying the $516 and the HOA refusing to sign a release, they could turn around and say, “well now we want the $1,213 too” or worse it would look like an admission of guilt and that could be used against me down the road if anyone else decides they want to take action.My questions are:- Is paying the agreed upon $516 and official admission of guilt?